Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
Am 25.10.20 um 22:47 schrieb Leigh Scott: See https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md Githubs CEO has contacted the youtube-dl devs to help them getting theire repo back online: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/4zuP1Ce7AJU/riaas-youtube-dl-takedown-ticks-off-developers-and-githubs-ceo best regards, Marius ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bsd wtf (was Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations)
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 10:16 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:47:42 + > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini > > > > > > > > > LOL :-) > > > > > > IANAL=I am not a lawyer > > > > you may install wtf [1] (part of bsd-games package) and query > > aboutthis acronym [2] > > > > [1] > > dnf install /usr/bin/wtf > > > > [2] > > wtf IANAL > > > > IANAL: I am not a lawyer > > I did not know that was a thing but I'm happy to know it now. > > To save some time in case someone else is curious and ends up going > down the same rabbit hole I did: > > There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively > forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are > not > quite games including wtf (the readme says "outdated acronym lookup. > We > have Google now."). However, the fedora package doesn't appear to > built > from the new upstream, still using 2.17 as a base which still has wtf > instead of the new upstream's 3.x. > > [1] https://github.com/msharov/bsd-games > > The ftp site that is often credited for being the upstream url for > bsd-games [2] isn't working for me at the moment but I don't know if > that's just temporary. > > [2] ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/games/ > > There is a sourceforge project [3] which mirrors NetBSD's updates to > the wtf acronym database. That acronym database in NetBSD [4] is > still > regularly updated and the sourceforge project is still seeing > updates. > > [3] https://sourceforge.net/projects/bsdwtf/ > [4] http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/acronyms > Hi, wtf was updated to wtf version 20200829 a few weeks ago I use the files from https://sourceforge.net/projects/bsdwtf/, which is updated by the person who updates http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/acronyms Due to the lack of time, bsdwtf is still in the bsd-games package. Thanks for letting me know about this new upstream , but the only thing I want to keep from the bsd-games package is wtf, because it is super useful when someone writes an acronym that I don't know yet and I also think acronyms is a super useful tool to communicate :). Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bsd wtf (was Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations)
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 1:46 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:33, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > > > > > > There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively > > > forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are not > > > quite games including wtf (the readme says "outdated acronym lookup. We > > > have Google now."). However, the fedora package doesn't appear to built > > > from the new upstream, still using 2.17 as a base which still has wtf > > > instead of the new upstream's 3.x. > > > > wtf, why isn't it updated? > > I am not sure if there is a missing :) to say if this was a joke It was a joke :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bsd wtf (was Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations)
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:33, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > > > > There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively > > forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are not > > quite games including wtf (the readme says "outdated acronym lookup. We > > have Google now."). However, the fedora package doesn't appear to built > > from the new upstream, still using 2.17 as a base which still has wtf > > instead of the new upstream's 3.x. > > wtf, why isn't it updated? > I am not sure if there is a missing :) to say if this was a joke on the fact that the bsd-games isn't updated to the latest and would then lose wtf.. or if it is a serious question. For the serious answer... I am guessing the lack of updates has to do with the history of bsd-games not being 'solid'. I believe the 'upstream' is one of several forks of the original code which used to be on metalab from times long ago. Different distributions have used different versions at different times so it isn't always clear which one is the 'real' bsd-games. Some of the forks have made large changes to ui and game layout and some of them had code which may or may not be really BSD code. Either one of those can cause either screams of outrage. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bsd wtf (was Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations)
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > > There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively > forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are not > quite games including wtf (the readme says "outdated acronym lookup. We > have Google now."). However, the fedora package doesn't appear to built > from the new upstream, still using 2.17 as a base which still has wtf > instead of the new upstream's 3.x. wtf, why isn't it updated? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
bsd wtf (was Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations)
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:47:42 + Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini > > > > > > LOL :-) > > > > IANAL=I am not a lawyer > > you may install wtf [1] (part of bsd-games package) and query > aboutthis acronym [2] > > [1] > dnf install /usr/bin/wtf > > [2] > wtf IANAL > > IANAL: I am not a lawyer I did not know that was a thing but I'm happy to know it now. To save some time in case someone else is curious and ends up going down the same rabbit hole I did: There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are not quite games including wtf (the readme says "outdated acronym lookup. We have Google now."). However, the fedora package doesn't appear to built from the new upstream, still using 2.17 as a base which still has wtf instead of the new upstream's 3.x. [1] https://github.com/msharov/bsd-games The ftp site that is often credited for being the upstream url for bsd-games [2] isn't working for me at the moment but I don't know if that's just temporary. [2] ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/games/ There is a sourceforge project [3] which mirrors NetBSD's updates to the wtf acronym database. That acronym database in NetBSD [4] is still regularly updated and the sourceforge project is still seeing updates. [3] https://sourceforge.net/projects/bsdwtf/ [4] http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/acronyms Tim pgptZVdWSfttF.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 26.10.2020 12:32, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: IANAL, but I think that the crux of the RIAA's request is that the offending code used as an evidence of copyright-circumventing nature of the source code as a whole, so it's not that simple Next time they will try to block all torrent clients, then media players and even web browsers, because all of them can be used to download/play copyrighted content. And this is indeed up to legal, may be youtube-dl RPM have to be a downloader for the actual source code now to be legally clean, or something. Or just moved to RPM Fusion. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 26.10.2020 12:40, Daniel Pocock wrote: Notice that what I proposed provides opt-in censorship. People can use the list from RIAA if they need to but nobody is forced to use the list. That is not the same as silently censoring things. Such a list would make it much easier to block applications/packages. Next time they will try to block all torrent clients, then media players and even web browsers. We just need to follow the standard DMCA procedure: 1. copyright holders **must** submit full copyright infringing URLs; 2. The Law team will review these requests. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
Le lun. 26 oct. 2020 à 12:10, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit : > > On 26.10.2020 11:29, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > I've recently made some suggestions about using IPFS as part of the > > packaging workflow[1] > > Censorship is evil. If the copyright holders complain about any > packages, they should be moved to RPM Fusion repository. As the RPM Fusion project coordinator, I wouldn't assume such a solution as a given. This can be eventually discussed. But I, as someone already stated, please don't assume legal discussion to be headed here in the fedora devel list. Also please remember that rpmfusion is respectful for copyrights in "european right acceptance". ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 26/10/2020 12:09, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 26.10.2020 11:29, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> I've recently made some suggestions about using IPFS as part of the >> packaging workflow[1] > > Censorship is evil. If the copyright holders complain about any > packages, they should be moved to RPM Fusion repository. > > We don't need any registries at all. Don't make their life easier. Notice that what I proposed provides opt-in censorship. People can use the list from RIAA if they need to but nobody is forced to use the list. That is not the same as silently censoring things. IPFS ensures that both the content and the blacklist is distributed as widely as possible so any developer can view and audit the banned content to verify if it should really be on the blacklist. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:13:07PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 26.10.2020 11:28, Damian Ivanov wrote: > >Well if some tests do download copyrighted material, > >I wonder how this has become blocked in the first place... > > I think upstream can easily move the tests to a separate repository and > remove the copyrighted URLs from the documentation. IANAL, but I think that the crux of the RIAA's request is that the offending code used as an evidence of copyright-circumventing nature of the source code as a whole, so it's not that simple for having-h264-codec-in-a-separate-repository-for-legal-reasons Fedora. And this is indeed up to legal, may be youtube-dl RPM have to be a downloader for the actual source code now to be legally clean, or something. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 26.10.2020 11:28, Damian Ivanov wrote: Well if some tests do download copyrighted material, I wonder how this has become blocked in the first place... I think upstream can easily move the tests to a separate repository and remove the copyrighted URLs from the documentation. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 26.10.2020 11:29, Daniel Pocock wrote: I've recently made some suggestions about using IPFS as part of the packaging workflow[1] Censorship is evil. If the copyright holders complain about any packages, they should be moved to RPM Fusion repository. We don't need any registries at all. Don't make their life easier. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 26/10/2020 10:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 25.10.2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote: >> https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md > > Self-censorship is the worst thing in the world. We shouldn't do > anything with this. I've recently made some suggestions about using IPFS as part of the packaging workflow[1] Fedora could then publish a list of banned RPMs by IPFS hash. People can use that list to filter what they install on their system if it is applicable to them. For example, the RIAA could volunteer to maintain a list of all banned packages, they could even publish that list in IPFS too. To give an example of how that might be relevant in this case: - the source code appears in IPFS (they even have instructions to push[2] a Git repo into IPFS), this creates one of the hashes for RIAA to put on their blacklist, then they don't have to make a huge list of forks like they have in the takedown notice - somebody else creates a spec file as another object in IPFS - somebody creates an SRPM, that is in IPFS too - somebody creates and signs binary RPMs, putting them in IPFS - the hashes for all these things are tracked centrally Regards, Daniel 1. https://danielpocock.com/distributed-packaging-workflow/ 2. https://docs.ipfs.io/how-to/host-git-style-repo/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
Well if some tests do download copyrighted material, I wonder how this has become blocked in the first place... On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:24 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 26.10.2020 11:00, Damian Ivanov wrote: > > If you check the fork and what has been removed, > > it will be obvious how this happened > > Yes, they removed some tests and links from the README. But I think the > package maintainer should wait for upstream reaction first. The new fork > is owned by third-parties and hosted on GitHub again, so it can be > blocked again. > > I think the upstream should switch from GitHub to another hosting, for > example self-hosted Gitea on their own server. > > -- > Sincerely, >Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 26.10.2020 11:00, Damian Ivanov wrote: If you check the fork and what has been removed, it will be obvious how this happened Yes, they removed some tests and links from the README. But I think the package maintainer should wait for upstream reaction first. The new fork is owned by third-parties and hosted on GitHub again, so it can be blocked again. I think the upstream should switch from GitHub to another hosting, for example self-hosted Gitea on their own server. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
If you check the fork and what has been removed, it will be obvious how this happened On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:54 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 25.10.2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote: > > https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md > > Self-censorship is the worst thing in the world. We shouldn't do > anything with this. > > -- > Sincerely, >Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 25.10.2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote: https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md Self-censorship is the worst thing in the world. We shouldn't do anything with this. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > > I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude... > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini > > > LOL :-) > > IANAL=I am not a lawyer you may install wtf [1] (part of bsd-games package) and query aboutthis acronym [2] [1] dnf install /usr/bin/wtf [2] wtf IANAL IANAL: I am not a lawyer > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
> I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude... > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini wrote: LOL :-) IANAL=I am not a lawyer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude... On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:52 PM Christian Dersch > wrote: > > > > > > On 25/10/2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > See > > > > > > https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md > > > > > > There is already a fork of youtube-dl removing the critical parts, maybe > > we should switch if Fedora has to remove original youtube-dl for legal > > reasons: https://github.com/l1ving/youtube-dl > > > > Greetings, > > > > Christian > > IANAL, but maybe we should not speculate about such things on the devel > list? > > Fabio > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:52 PM Christian Dersch wrote: > > > On 25/10/2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote: > > See > > > > https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md > > > There is already a fork of youtube-dl removing the critical parts, maybe > we should switch if Fedora has to remove original youtube-dl for legal > reasons: https://github.com/l1ving/youtube-dl > > Greetings, > > Christian IANAL, but maybe we should not speculate about such things on the devel list? Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: youtube-dl Copyright Violations
On 25/10/2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote: See https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md There is already a fork of youtube-dl removing the critical parts, maybe we should switch if Fedora has to remove original youtube-dl for legal reasons: https://github.com/l1ving/youtube-dl Greetings, Christian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
youtube-dl Copyright Violations
See https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
