On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:37:10AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 09/08/2011 03:44 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
> > yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
> > builddeps on a 64-bit system
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:27:20AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
> > yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
> > builddeps on a 64-bi
On 09/08/2011 06:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
>> yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
>> builddeps on a 64-bit system?
>
> Is 'se
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hi All,
> On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
> yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
> builddeps on a 64-bit system?
Is 'setarch i686 yum-builddep foo' not enough?
- ajax
si
On 09/08/2011 03:44 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hi All,
> On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
> yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
> builddeps on a 64-bit system?
It's been recently implemented at upstream, see
https://bugzilla.redh
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system?
Yours Tony
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
