Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Policy for Glade File Updates

2013-10-02 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 12.09.2013 02:38, schrieb Matthew Brush: Hi, I (as a unregular contributor) would love to be able to use glade. To sum the problem up: - As long as we're still on GTK+ 2.x we won't be able to use upstream Glade (Geany on GTK+3 is fine, btw, thanks for that work). - Worse, only a few

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Policy for Glade File Updates

2013-10-02 Thread Dimitar Zhekov
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:01:09 +0200 Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote: To sum the problem up: - As long as we're still on GTK+ 2.x we won't be able to use upstream Glade (Geany on GTK+3 is fine, btw, thanks for that work). - Worse, only a few older versions work.

[Geany-Devel] On Deprecation of Platforms

2013-10-02 Thread Lex Trotman
All Developers, Its time we deprecated windows support!! The windows code in Geany is: - unmaintained and bit-rotting - buggy - holding us at an unreasonably old GTK version - hard to maintain due to being hacks on top of hacks - few of the developers have access to a representative

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Policy for Glade File Updates

2013-10-02 Thread Lex Trotman
Is there a problem with this approach? That means when the minimum version of GTK is increased we will have to upgrade to version of Glade that supports the new widgets that come with the new GTK. And then apply the fixes. So along with lack of windows maintenance (please lets deprecate it)

Re: [Geany-Devel] On Deprecation of Platforms

2013-10-02 Thread Lex Trotman
On 3 October 2013 11:24, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote: On 13-10-02 05:19 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: All Developers, Its time we deprecated windows support!! The windows code in Geany is: - unmaintained and bit-rotting - buggy - holding us at an unreasonably old GTK version