Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Lex Trotman
[...]>> >> std::vector has a second parameter, which has a default value so its >> legal to omit it, but the type you will get from an accurate parser to >> store in TM will be the complete type which will be something like >> std::vector not just plain std::vector. >> This is

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 01.09.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Lex Trotman: [...] It is of course always "possible", after all its a mere matter of programming :) And of course an instantiated class template is just a type, but what is the name of std::vector and std::vector so it can be looked up? vector and vector, with

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2016-09-01 01:55 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 01.09.2016 um 07:47 schrieb Matthew Brush: On 2016-08-31 10:08 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 31.08.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Lex Trotman: I think we all agree that help of language-specific plugins is desired/required. No need to restate "we need

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Lex Trotman
[...] >> It is of course always "possible", after all its a mere matter of >> programming :) >> >> And of course an instantiated class template is just a type, but what >> is the name of std::vector and std::vector so it can be looked >> up? > > > vector and vector, with scope being std (I think

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 31/08/2016 à 03:27, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 2016-08-30 06:43 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: >> Le 29/08/2016 à 05:14, Matthew Brush a écrit : >>> […] >> >> I'm really not sure it's a good idea to go the custom callback way. >> IMO, we should first try and see how easy it'd be with plugins

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 01.09.2016 um 07:47 schrieb Matthew Brush: On 2016-08-31 10:08 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 31.08.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Lex Trotman: I think we all agree that help of language-specific plugins is desired/required. No need to restate "we need language specific support" all the time. We just

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 01.09.2016 um 08:05 schrieb Lex Trotman: On 1 September 2016 at 15:08, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 31.08.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Lex Trotman: I think we all agree that help of language-specific plugins is desired/required. No need to restate "we need language specific

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2016-08-31 11:42 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 01.09.2016 um 07:17 schrieb Matthew Brush: On 2016-08-31 09:57 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 01.09.2016 um 02:50 schrieb Matthew Brush: I don't think they'll usually require a "build system" per se, but they definitively need to be told how to

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 01.09.2016 um 07:17 schrieb Matthew Brush: On 2016-08-31 09:57 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 01.09.2016 um 02:50 schrieb Matthew Brush: I don't think they'll usually require a "build system" per se, but they definitively need to be told how to compile the code where applicable. For

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-09-01 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2016-08-31 08:42 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: On 31 August 2016 at 11:27, Matthew Brush wrote: On 2016-08-30 06:43 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: [...] Having our own callback means one more indirection, and changing the SciLexer to CONTAINER anyway, so I don't see much