On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:51:14 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 13 March 2013 04:47, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
>
> > When you execute a gdb -exec-interrupt command in debugger or Scope, a
> > SIGINT is sent to the inferior, and to gdb, and to Geany. But if you
> > start gdb from a terminal, the signal i
On 13 March 2013 04:47, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:18:10 +1100
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> Geany currently uses SIGQUIT to terminate a running program (using the
>> execute menu item or toolbar button when it shows the stop icon).
>> This has always been the case since the stop
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:18:10 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Geany currently uses SIGQUIT to terminate a running program (using the
> execute menu item or toolbar button when it shows the stop icon).
> This has always been the case since the stop button was added.
>
> There is a big comment in the co
Le 11/03/2013 23:42, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> [...]
>> But it's probably not that hard to implement on older versions
>> ourselves, even if it simply means to borrow the relevant code…
>>
>
> As Enrico said, "Glad you volunteered" :)
Nah, it doesn't work, you aren't Enrico ;)
> A final comment is
[...]
> That's not the way to go. IIUC what everybody does is triggering
> something in the real program flow from the handler. E.g. write
> something to a pipe that is monitored by the main loop, and then the
> main loop would do the real handling. That don't seem so hard to
> implement, is it?
Le 11/03/2013 22:36, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> On 12 March 2013 08:25, Enrico Tröger wrote:
>> Hey Lex,
>>
>> did you intentionally answered off-list?
>
> Nah, your mail was to list and cc me, so the "smart" mailer chose to
> reply to you, and its too early in the morning for me to notice :)
>
> T
On 12 March 2013 08:25, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> Hey Lex,
>
> did you intentionally answered off-list?
Nah, your mail was to list and cc me, so the "smart" mailer chose to
reply to you, and its too early in the morning for me to notice :)
This cced to the list for the record :)
>
>
>> I don't
On 11/03/13 05:17, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 11 March 2013 14:58, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> On 11/03/2013 10:18, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> [...]
>>> My understanding of Unix/Linux signals is that the comment above is
>>> wrong and always has been wrong, a signal sent to a child process by a
On 11 March 2013 14:58, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 11/03/2013 10:18, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> [...]
>> My understanding of Unix/Linux signals is that the comment above is
>> wrong and always has been wrong, a signal sent to a child process by a
>> parent process does not get delivered to t
On 11/03/2013 10:18, Lex Trotman wrote:
> Hi All,
> [...]
> My understanding of Unix/Linux signals is that the comment above is
> wrong and always has been wrong, a signal sent to a child process by a
> parent process does not get delivered to the parent.
>
> I don't know if anybodys memory is goo
Hi All,
Geany currently uses SIGQUIT to terminate a running program (using the
execute menu item or toolbar button when it shows the stop icon).
This has always been the case since the stop button was added.
There is a big comment in the code explaining why SIGQUIT is used, and
its problems:
11 matches
Mail list logo
