Le 08/07/2015 05:19, Matthew Brush a écrit :
[…]
So does that mean it's ok to make comments either on the main page of
the pull request or the files changed view which shows the combined
changes?
Depends what you mean ok, but yeah they shouldn't get lost.
The problem is that sometimes it's
Le 29/06/2015 10:24, Thomas Martitz a écrit :
[…]
That helps only existing users, and only that fraction that actually
reads release notes (I would think the bulk of them doesn't).
Perhaps it would be indeed best to not toggle the default for this
release already?
Makes sense to me, and
So I've finally got a chance to look at my non-API calls. I was able to
code around most of them, but there are two that would be much easier if
we could make them APIs. (I haven't pushed any of these changes to my
git repo yet.) Could we consider making these API?
*
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
I propose that we disallow force pushing, rebasing, squashing, etc.
on any PR until it is fully ready for final merging. […] ready for
merging. At that point it _might_ make sense to fudge history and get
rid of some
On Jul 8, 2015 7:18 PM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 2015-07-08 10:57 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
So I've finally got a chance to look at my non-API calls. I was able to
code around most of them, but there are two that would be much easier if
we could make them APIs.
On 2015-07-08 07:28 PM, Steve wrote:
On Jul 8, 2015 7:18 PM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 2015-07-08 10:57 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
So I've finally got a chance to look at my non-API calls. I was able to
code around most of them, but there are two that would be much easier
On 2015-07-08 10:57 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
[snip]
Let me know if this is possible or how I should proceed. I use geany
with my plugins daily, and can't upgrade my code base until my plugins
are working.
I forgot to mention, if you made your plugin part of the Geany-Plugins
project (I'm
Am 09.07.2015 um 04:28 schrieb Steve:
On Jul 8, 2015 7:18 PM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 2015-07-08 10:57 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
So I've finally got a chance to look at my non-API calls. I was able to
code around most of them, but there are two that would be much easier
On 2015-07-08 01:03 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca
[snip]
So personally I wouldn't carve any rules in stone and would decide case
to case. For bigger patches with many review comments it's probably best
to ask the reviewer which way he
On 2015-07-08 10:57 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
So I've finally got a chance to look at my non-API calls. I was able to
code around most of them, but there are two that would be much easier if
we could make them APIs. (I haven't pushed any of these changes to my
git repo yet.) Could we
10 matches
Mail list logo
