Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-08-29 Thread Lex Trotman
On 29 August 2016 at 22:38, Thomas Martitz wrote: > Am 29.08.2016 um 14:23 schrieb Lex Trotman: >> >> This adds per use case hooks to plugins, which then became part of the >> stable API. I don't think that we have to codify every single use case of >> tags into the plugins.

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-08-29 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2016-08-29 03:17 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 29.08.2016 um 17:05 schrieb Jiří Techet: [...] There is also another aspect about the proposal that worries me: a plugin shall provide N features for M languages. And X plugins might be compete (not even considering the desire that plugins can

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-08-29 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 29.08.2016 um 17:05 schrieb Jiří Techet: The solution I have in mind simply allows plugins to pass tags to Geany which they parsed with more advanced code. The tags itself would advanced too, to allow for the improvements current TM+ctags can't offer. Symbol tree, calltips,

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-08-29 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2016-08-29 05:38 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 29.08.2016 um 14:23 schrieb Lex Trotman: This adds per use case hooks to plugins, which then became part of the stable API. I don't think that we have to codify every single use case of tags into the plugins. That's just making it harder (maybe

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-08-29 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 29.08.2016 um 14:23 schrieb Lex Trotman: This adds per use case hooks to plugins, which then became part of the stable API. I don't think that we have to codify every single use case of tags into the plugins. That's just making it harder (maybe impossible?) to change or add use cases. The

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-08-29 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 29.08.2016 um 05:14 schrieb Matthew Brush: Hi All, Related to my previous mail, and assuming it is somewhat reasonable, I would like to propose a list of initial features that will be useful to allow plugins to provide, in no particular order: I disagree with this approach. This adds

Re: [Geany-Devel] [FT-plugins] Proposed "Features"

2016-08-29 Thread Jiří Techet
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Matthew Brush wrote: > Hi All, > > Related to my previous mail, and assuming it is somewhat reasonable, I > would like to propose a list of initial features that will be useful to > allow plugins to provide, in no particular order: > >