Re: [Geany-Devel] Helping Geany move forward: testing

2017-04-28 Thread Lex Trotman
As an exercise I scanned the top few (highest numbered) PRs to assess their commitability from MY personal point of view, found one immediately committable and did, the rest are: #1482 still open question if it should revert to previous bad behaviour. #1481 work in progress #1478 improvement

Re: [Geany-Devel] Helping Geany move forward: testing

2017-04-28 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2017-04-28 06:35 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: ... Geany is almost entirely an interactive application, so until interactive tests are possible I don't think technical tests like these will add a great deal to the committability of PRs. If the tests just test functions, all it needs is to get

Re: [Geany-Devel] Helping Geany move forward: testing

2017-04-28 Thread Lex Trotman
... >> >> Geany is almost entirely an interactive application, so until >> interactive tests are possible I don't think technical tests like >> these will add a great deal to the committability of PRs. > > > If the tests just test functions, all it needs is to get Geany started up, > then the

Re: [Geany-Devel] Helping Geany move forward: testing

2017-04-28 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2017-04-28 05:35 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: On 29 April 2017 at 09:55, Matthew Brush wrote: On 2017-04-28 02:35 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov: Hi all, From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the things

Re: [Geany-Devel] Helping Geany move forward: testing

2017-04-28 Thread Lex Trotman
On 29 April 2017 at 09:55, Matthew Brush wrote: > On 2017-04-28 02:35 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: >> >> Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the >>> things holding back Geany

Re: [Geany-Devel] Helping Geany move forward: testing

2017-04-28 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2017-04-28 02:35 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov: Hi all, From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the things holding back Geany development right now is a need for more testing. Helping to test PRs is truly needed, and much

Re: [Geany-Devel] Helping Geany move forward: testing

2017-04-28 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov: Hi all, From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the things holding back Geany development right now is a need for more testing. Helping to test PRs is truly needed, and much appreciated. However, I do think that Geany