Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
Build JFFS2 size
-
465183MB
466203MB
478203MB
482205MB
I just ran fslint¹ on build 485² and it reported³:
14,077,952 bytes wasted in 1590 files (in 1495 groups)
due to duplicate files.
For example there are many duplicate
Pádraig Brady wrote:
For example there are many duplicate py[oc] files,
Yeah, do we really have to ship pyc nd pyo files?
They're sometimes even bigger than the source code,
probably due to the full blown UTF-32 strings.
No other dynamic language needs that pre-tokenized junk.
Is Python so
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
...
No other dynamic language needs that pre-tokenized junk.
Is Python so slow at parsing? Has anybody measured the
hit?
There is some minor improvement in speed from the cached byte code.
That said, there's no reason to *ship* them, you can run a compileall
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 23:47 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Comment (by J5):
Replying to [comment:4 bert]:
Replying to [comment:3 J5]:
This was generated incorrectly. First the version should be -9
second
the activity should be Chat-9.xo. It looks like it was simply
zipped
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 20:39 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 14:18 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
BTW We now have an official registered mime type vnd.olpc-sugar which
specifies XO as the magic key to identify the mime type. At some
point the PK in the zip header will
