2008/10/13 Harshvardhan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
true. plus a good broadband network connection,
And a personal jetpack too!
Now, while the personal jetpacks evolve, let's look at more realistic
steps forward :-)
This can work locally for all sorts of fun and educational uses. Some
schools will have
On 10/12/08, Carlos Nazareno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey OLPC team.
No, really, is there any chance OLPC can ship Gnash 0.8.4 with XO OS
final 8.2.0?
Very doubtful.. this Gnash release is several weeks too late to meet
8.2.0. We froze things quite a while ago.
My suggestion would be to find
Le dimanche 12 octobre 2008 à 19:11 +1100, Pia Waugh a écrit :
Hi all,
We now have Videochat v9 which works. This is a great thing that will help
children connect, and in particular help with remote support for children.
It could assist with eHealth, remote education, speech therapy and any
Just a couple of additions:
* We should make sure to have a good summary of the actionable items
produced during the meetings, post them to the larger community, gather
feedback and consensus and finally add them to the SL roadmap.
* It would be very beneficial to spend some time explaining SL
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 16:24 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Right now, revisor can build a pristine F9 installer CD but cannot
build a F9 + updates installer CD.
The problem appears by merely enabling the additional repo in the
stock F9 config files that ship with Revisor. It has also been
On Oct 13, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 10/12/08, Carlos Nazareno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey OLPC team.
No, really, is there any chance OLPC can ship Gnash 0.8.4 with XO OS
final 8.2.0?
Very doubtful.. this Gnash release is several weeks too late to meet
8.2.0. We froze
Hi Chris and Deepak,
in Ubifs, I have tried unsetting the compression xattr on files, but
reads were equally slow so I guess the contents weren't actually
uncompressed. Even tried dd'ing to an empty existing file without the
c attribute, but the result was the same. Any idea what I'm doing
wrong?
Le lundi 13 octobre 2008 à 13:44 +1300, Douglas Bagnall a écrit :
This patch to Collabora's OLPC ejabberd-rpm package makes
/etc/init.d/ejabberd look for (and, if possible, incorporate)
/etc/sysconfig/ejabberd. Two options can be set there:
- CONFIG_FILE gives an alternative to
On Oct 13, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Robert Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btu end users could install them and have them work if gnash 0.8.4
was
available.
If end-users have to drop to a command line and do something, which I
assume
On Oct 13 2008, at 14:59, Tomeu Vizoso was caught saying:
Hi Chris and Deepak,
in Ubifs, I have tried unsetting the compression xattr on files, but
reads were equally slow so I guess the contents weren't actually
uncompressed. Even tried dd'ing to an empty existing file without the
c
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really do not get it do you!! The basic functionality should be
provided by OLPC with a build of gnash optimized for the Geode.
I'm glad to hear that 0.8.4 will result in a significantly better
experience for XO
Tomeu:
Scott:
I think more like:
Nov 17-20: talks and hacking
Nov 21: priorities meeting, wrapup.
I'm not the planning committee, but this would be what I'd like to see.
Works for me. Should we be concerned that talk (or aguing) might
expand so much that there's little time to take
1) I just did a clean candidate-767
update for another G1G1-1 XO
and observed that the initial attempt
to share a Chat session comes up with
the talk bubble followed by the
invite to without Chat or Chat
Activity at the end.
After sharing another activity and then
going back to the Chat, when I
Folks -
I would like to spend some time this week getting a bit more consensus on
the goals and agenda for this conversation before we get too far ahead with
planning and invitations. I don't want to spend the first day setting the
scope and expectations for the week only to discover that some
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:57:57PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really do not get it do you!! The basic functionality should be
provided by OLPC with a build of gnash optimized for the Geode.
I should note that I'm
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 20:22, Chris Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I just did a clean candidate-767
update for another G1G1-1 XO
and observed that the initial attempt
to share a Chat session comes up with
the talk bubble followed by the
invite to without Chat or Chat
Activity at the
Hi,
I have updated the UBIFS 8.2 image on d.l.o with a
new kernel that includes various backports from kernel.org.
One major change that is noticeable is that the free space
calculation reports 921MiB free instead of 822MiB due to
improved df reporting. I've also disabled debug messages
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Pyke Jr.,RN,CPNP wrote:
| It aappears to be interestimg. But if your doing remote telehealth you
need to have 30 fps for video.
I think this is a misunderstanding.
We are not talking about robotic remote surgery here, or anything
requiring
Hi all,
Reminder that tomorrow (tues) we will have our dev meeting at 11am.
We'll be meeting in the basement conference room.
-Peter
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
For the record, I consider Dan to have spoken authoritatively on this
matter. As he says, the best things that you can do now are to
demonstrate that the newer gnash can safely be deployed either via 'yum
update', via 'olpc-update', or by providing a custom installation script
Our release
2) I then tried to install and use TuxPaint versions 1 and 2 and Squeak.
I notice that except for the kernel package squeak-vm, Squeak does
not seem to be present in 767. There are available a number of
optional Activities programmed in squeak, but I don't have any
installed currently.
As
I think its very exciting to see telemedicne applications being developed
for this platform. But I also think you need to be very careful here. There
are multiple studies on resolutuion of images and utility for various
telemedicine purposes. (ie Still images from a 2 megapixel camera are likely
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Paul Heinzelmann wrote:
I think its very exciting to see telemedicne applications being developed
for this platform. But I also think you need to be very careful here. There
are multiple studies on resolutuion of images and utility for various
telemedicine purposes. (ie
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Paul Heinzelmann wrote:
I sense that there are a lot of new and yet-to-be-discovered ways to use
these kind of low-bandwidth capabilities for health (including consultation,
collaboration, and education). The perceived value of these will always be
user-dependent and
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2515
Changes in build 2515 from build: 2514
Size delta: 0.00M
-coreutils 6.10-30.fc9
+coreutils 6.10-33.fc9
-cups-libs 1:1.3.8-2.fc9
+cups-libs 1:1.3.9-1.fc9
-shared-mime-info 0.30-1.fc9
+shared-mime-info 0.30-3.fc9
-sqlite 3.5.9-1.fc9
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:23 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
OLPC's XS ships a number of patched packages. The packages are
normally built with a different stream or flavour (they don't say
f9 but xs05) and sit in a special repository.
Is there a good way to ensure revisor/yum prefers the
I sense that there are a lot of new and yet-to-be-discovered ways to use
these kind of low-bandwidth capabilities for health (including consultation,
collaboration, and education). The perceived value of these will always be
user-dependent and likely require a trial and error approach.
In terms
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:24 PM, James Antill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you are going to ship a repo to end users which requires/uses
the yum-priority plugin (or excludes, or whatever),
I am shipping a heavily preconfigured spin, the OLPC School Server.
It points to the standard F9
Martin Langhoff wrote:
Right now, revisor can build a pristine F9 installer CD but cannot
build a F9 + updates installer CD.
The problem appears by merely enabling the additional repo in the
stock F9 config files that ship with Revisor. It has also been
reported elsewhere:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Connie Sieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I excluded glibc* from the Everything repository in the
revisor-f9-i386.conf file just to get past this error.
How do you do that?
m
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:23 AM, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error is
Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package
glibc-2.8-3.i386
Is there any other debug information available?
_something_ is pulling in
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Connie Sieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I excluded glibc* from the Everything repository in the
revisor-f9-i386.conf file just to get past this error.
How do you do that?
Add
excludes=glibc*
to
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:57 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:27 PM, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can use yum's priorities plugin to achieve similar results.
It's a bit simpler than apt but I can sure work with this. Thanks!
Just as in the apt-world
Martin Langhoff wrote:
OLPC's XS ships a number of patched packages. The packages are
normally built with a different stream or flavour (they don't say
f9 but xs05) and sit in a special repository.
Is there a good way to ensure revisor/yum prefers the packages from
the xs stream or repo
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Jerry Vonau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you not use the xs-config/xs-pkgs to state specific Requires:= to
control whether an updated package is able replace what is currently
installed or to be installed on the system, kind of protecting the base
install?
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:48 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:24 PM, James Antill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you are going to ship a repo to end users which requires/uses
the yum-priority plugin (or excludes, or whatever),
I am shipping a heavily preconfigured
36 matches
Mail list logo
