Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Peter Robinson
also notice that the Size delta on the 8.2 vs joyride build is reporting 0meg difference which is clearly rubbish :-) Can someone fix it for me please. The URL I'm referring to is http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride_vs_8.2.html This one works:

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Drake
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Jeremy Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And you've managed to make it so that if anyone else writes an app using totem-pl-parser and expecting that the podcast bits will work will utterly fail. Last time around, I tested my patch with podcasts and they worked OK.

Re: Wacom Bamboo with XO?

2008-11-18 Thread pgf
robert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul, Are you using the driver code from http://linuxwacom.sourceforge.net/ ? no -- i just built the driver that's in the kernel tree. paul I had intended on trying this but have been too busy to get the time set up the correct environment or

New joyride build 2551

2008-11-18 Thread Build Announcer v2
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2551 Changes in build 2551 from build: 2550 Size delta: 0.00M -plymouth 0.6.0-0.2008.11.12.4.fc10 +plymouth 0.6.0-0.2008.11.17.3.fc10 -plymouth-libs 0.6.0-0.2008.11.12.4.fc10 +plymouth-libs 0.6.0-0.2008.11.17.3.fc10 -plymouth-scripts

Re: Differents behaviours of my application

2008-11-18 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Aleix, On 18 Nov 2008, at 17:13, Aleix Palet wrote: To do this, I've reading the wiki (which is a bit confusing) and I learned that I have to play with the read_file and write_file options. What I've done is what I write next (with the consequent problems): Wiki baptism by fire :-)

Re: Differents behaviours of my application

2008-11-18 Thread Gary C Martin
On 18 Nov 2008, at 17:55, Gary C Martin wrote: Hi Aleix, On 18 Nov 2008, at 17:13, Aleix Palet wrote: To do this, I've reading the wiki (which is a bit confusing) and I learned that I have to play with the read_file and write_file options. What I've done is what I write next (with the

Re: XO deployment count?

2008-11-18 Thread david
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Eben Eliason wrote: As an asset on our main website, it aims to be as authoritative as possible. The current numbers were populated via the wiki

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Drake
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've started looking through the various packages that have been pulled into joyride as part of the upgrade to Fedora-10 and reviewing packages to see what differs from upstream, 8.2 and various other olpcX packages. I'm

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know how this will fly for already-overworked OLPC employees, but for me, I can work with that. It seem like Peter and the other Fedora guys are offering to help us poor overworked OLPC developers :) Marco

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Ed McNierney
And this is a very important priority for those poor overworked OLPC developers! We need a continued effort and commitment to push OLPC code upstream, including the recruitment of as many helpful volunteers as possible. One way to help keep those volunteers on board is to make it clear

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Peter Robinson
I've started looking through the various packages that have been pulled into joyride as part of the upgrade to Fedora-10 and reviewing packages to see what differs from upstream, 8.2 and various other olpcX packages. I'm aware of a number of packages that have been pulled in due to

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Drake
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Inlined below but the problem we have at the moment with things pretty locked down in preparation for Fedora-10 final the changes and fixes we get in are being held in the updates queue (like the ones I fixed yesterday).

debxo 0.4 release

2008-11-18 Thread Andres Salomon
Hi, I just tagged DebXO 0.4 release. This release looks much much nicer, thanks to a new Xorg driver. There's also a jffs2 fix which should make bootup from NAND quite a bit faster. The release can be found here: http://lunge.mit.edu/~dilinger/debxo-latest/images/ Note that there's a known

Re: debxo 0.4 release

2008-11-18 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, Hi, I just tagged DebXO 0.4 release. This release looks much much nicer, thanks to a new Xorg driver. There's also a jffs2 fix which should make bootup from NAND quite a bit faster. Is the JFFS2 patch in the OLPC kernel too? (If so, got a link to it?) Thanks, - Chris. --

Re: debxo 0.4 release

2008-11-18 Thread Andres Salomon
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:09:29 -0500 Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Hi, I just tagged DebXO 0.4 release. This release looks much much nicer, thanks to a new Xorg driver. There's also a jffs2 fix which should make bootup from NAND quite a bit faster. Is the JFFS2

Re: Devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 54

2008-11-18 Thread James Simmons
, is really hard to find some documentation in the olpc wiki. Bye! -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081118/21820603/attachment-0001.htm ___ Devel mailing

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Peter Robinson
Inlined below but the problem we have at the moment with things pretty locked down in preparation for Fedora-10 final the changes and fixes we get in are being held in the updates queue (like the ones I fixed yesterday). Don't let this slow you down. Tag your packages as dist-olpc4. I just

Re: F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

2008-11-18 Thread Peter Robinson
Inlined below but the problem we have at the moment with things pretty locked down in preparation for Fedora-10 final the changes and fixes we get in are being held in the updates queue (like the ones I fixed yesterday). Don't let this slow you down. Tag your packages as dist-olpc4. I just

New joyride build 2553

2008-11-18 Thread Build Announcer v2
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2553 Changes in build 2553 from build: 2552 Size delta: 0.39M -ohm 0.1.1-6.11.20080119git.fc7 +ohm 0.1.1-7.22.20080921git.fc10 -olpc-netutils 0.4-2.fc10 +olpc-netutils 0.7-2.fc10 -olpc-utils 0.89-4.olpc4 +olpc-utils 0.89-6.fc10 -pixman

Re: New joyride build 2553

2008-11-18 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
2553: after I start Terminal, the keys along the top of the keyboard no longer work - not the Views, not Frame - nuthin'. mikus ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

[Server-devel] Setting up XS-0.5 for testing

2008-11-18 Thread Dan Poltawski
(Apologies as I haven't done extensive archive/wiki searching and i'm also a bit tired - Please point to RTFM) I'm looking at setting up a simple test rig for playing with the school server, and I have the following hardware for use: * An XO * A generic laptop with a wired a wireless

Re: [Server-devel] Setting up XS-0.5 for testing

2008-11-18 Thread Martin Langhoff
2008/11/18 Dan Poltawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm looking at setting up a simple test rig for playing with the school server, and I have the following hardware for use: * An XO * A generic laptop with a wired a wireless interface and XS-0.5 installed * A generic wireless AP * (A NATTed

Re: [Server-devel] Setting up XS-0.5 for testing

2008-11-18 Thread Jerry Vonau
Martin Langhoff wrote: 2008/11/18 Dan Poltawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm looking at setting up a simple test rig for playing with the school server, and I have the following hardware for use: * An XO * A generic laptop with a wired a wireless interface and XS-0.5 installed * A generic