Re: Please unlock Activities/G1G1/8.2

2008-11-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Activity versions still need to be pegged on [[Activities/G1G1/8.2]]. *Please*? - Bert - On 31.10.2008, at 23:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote: Hmm, Activities/Joyride still referred to Activities/Etoys_(8.2) but I can't really find my way in the tangle of G1G1 redirects to fix this properly.

Working on a theme - 'deployability'

2008-11-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
Early this week, in my xs-0.6 planning sessions I grouped the possible tasks under general themes because I felt that it was the right approach to prioritise/triage tasks with the very limited resources I have for the XS. It worked very well, and it allowed Greg and I to quickly figure out what

Re: Wacom Bamboo with XO?

2008-11-21 Thread Chris Marshall
Wade Brainerd wrote: For someone with a tablet, it would be nice to see the results of a simple PyGTK program which reports X, Y and Pressure from the gtk.gdk.SOURCE_PEN device, using the gtk.gdk.Device API. http://www.pygtk.org/docs/pygtk/class-gdkdevice.html If this works, it would be

Re: [Server-devel] ejabberd tests with old and new TLS code

2008-11-21 Thread Caroline Meeks
Hi Douglas, Thank you so much for this work. We are trying to come up the learning curve on the XS and scalability and I'm sure that I care about this data. Deds and I have been contemplating these and your previous results this morning and moving ourselves up the learning curve. TLS =

Re: [Server-devel] ejabberd tests with old and new TLS code

2008-11-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Caroline! TLS = ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security correct? Yes. ejabberd is a memory hog, and we recently discovered (hint: lots of detail in the mailing list archive) that it's only a memory hog when ssl/tls connections are used. Using ssl or tls in the xmpp protocol has

Re: [Server-devel] [ejabberd] ejabberd tests with old and new TLS code

2008-11-21 Thread Douglas Bagnall
Martin Langhoff wrote: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ejabberd_resource_tests/tls_comparison The graphs all have different y scales, which makes them hard to compare. Can you fix them easily to all be with the same y scale? Or put a big blinking warning - I've taken out the minimum graphs for

Re: [Server-devel] [ejabberd] ejabberd tests with old and new TLS code

2008-11-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Douglas Bagnall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin: some of my earliest tests were suggesting peaks over 1MB per connection, which might be the source of the confusion. But for those I probably *did* have the shared roster on, though because I was unaware that

Re: [Server-devel] ejabberd tests with old and new TLS code

2008-11-21 Thread Douglas Bagnall
Caroline Meeks Martin Langhoff: What releases are the control setup? IS the New TLS released code? The 'control' setup is the ejabberd-xs package we ship for XS-0.5. The new TLS code is a patch we could consider 'beta' quality -- there's been no significnat QA on it. In case anyone does