On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q3a16
>
> It fixes several issues that affect the display, and is especially
> appropriate for use with os40.
>
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.lapt
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q3a16
It fixes several issues that affect the display, and is especially
appropriate for use with os40.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Richard Smith wrote:
> Is it possible to turn the .zd scheme into the same FEC scheme so that
> fs-update and nandblaster use the same source stream? I know that adds
> a lot of additional overhead in the non-lossy channel case but even if
> it results in a slowdown in the fs-update case it mig
Yep. There is a lot of overhead, and there are also limitation in
the connection between the host
and the network interface. You should upgrade to a newer OS image,
however, You want to have
the latest libertas firmware (this may not improve the performance,
but it makes your results mo
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Nandblaster_for_XO-1.5 records my current
> thoughts about NANDblaster for XO-1.5. Please comment.
>It would be nice if we could take advantage of the fact that the data in the
> .zd file is already compressed, but I'm not sure how to fit that into the
> FEC scheme w
Please join us NOW reviewing the latest OLPC/Sugar community projects
over IRC Live Chat: (2PM EDT Boston Time Today/Friday)
http://forum.laptop.org/chat
Then type at bottom:
/join #olpc-meeting
AGENDA:
* New projects & libraries -- teaching them Community Outreach:
http://wiki.laptop.org/g
I have an A1 or A2 board (reports "D0") and I am wanting to fs-update
os30.zd on it. It errors out with a "Can't open device" that I think
refers to the microSD card.
Otherwise, have we got a utility to unpack & dd the .zd onto a filesystem?
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@lapt
I do not have a Fedora system. I've been using 'livecd-iso-to-disk'
script for building USB sticks from .iso files. But that never has
worked for me with XO-1.5 builds. And just now it failed with a
recent XO-1 build. [Booting stalls - can't mount root filesystem.]
A while ago I read a comp
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os40
Compressed image size: 411.16mb (+2.36mb since build 39)
Description of changes in this build:
* Kernel, bootanim and X now run at 24bpp, fixes some video hangs (#9646)
* Root device is automatically discovered based
Hello fellows, I´ve been working some time ago on the maximum throughput you
can get from an XO on it´s wireless and I got some interesting results, on
which I still have to work but I would like to share with you to know if I´m
trying to invent the wile again. But first the conditions, I´ve been u
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 23:43 -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Both yesterday and today, I'm getting an error message about
> filelists.xml.gz on http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/, from both
> the f11 and f11-xo1 repositories:
> " [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum"
Can't reproduce
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
wrote:
> Gabriela reports is solved using os8 (F11 for XO-1).
That's excellent news!
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stu
Gabriela reports is solved using os8 (F11 for XO-1).
Rafael Ortiz
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:10 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> This is being tracked as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9652
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> ___
> Sugar-d
I tried F11 for XO1.0 and there is no problem when connecting to a 32
characters SSID and opening the web browser.
Everything works fine with F11.
Thanks for your help!
2009/11/12 Gabriela Corrales
> I already open a ticket in dev.laptop.org and they just told me that it
> sounds like a liberta
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:01, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:50 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best.
>> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use
>> simplejson. If this is 0.84 on F11, then we can u
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best.
> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use
> simplejson.
I am not seeing the prob on 0.82, only on 0.84.5 -- I think the patch
was never applied to 0.
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:50 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best.
> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use
> simplejson. If this is 0.84 on F11, then we can use what python 2.6
> provides.
0.82 doesn't have this bu
2009/11/13 Martin Langhoff :
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Right now just using the json module in python 2.6 may be best as the
>> parser is a C module (AFAIR).
>>
>> Is because of a bug in cjson why those files aren't being parsed?
>
> Re-reading this -- and given tha
2009/11/12 Lucian Branescu :
> The json module (simplejson) has only the parser written in C, so it's
> still slower overall than cjson. Not by a lot, but measurable.
Well, we don't really care about overall slowness, but only if it's
fast enough for our actual use of it. In this case, we only car
I did a quick and not-so-scientific benchmark. The test involves a
round trip for a small json file 10 times.
cjson7.56759595871
simplejson-c 9.09944200516
simplejson-pure 58.1605060101
2009/11/13 Daniel Drake :
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:53 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:53 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> After a few tries, I did find that the same problem was reported in
> Debian, a patch proposed, and upstream rejected it:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534709
>
> As Tomeu mentions, Python 2.6 reduces the cjson/json p
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> It would be worth a quick look at fixing cjson yourself.
I am cheeky but I am not a C hacker. Looking around yesterday, I have
not found a way to report bugs against cjson. The "project homepage"
is the page of the company where the author w
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 04:37 -0500, Justin Petro wrote:
> Thank you for finding this link... However, it indicates on that page
> that it can only be used if the lcd/backlight powers up. Mine sounds
> more like symptom 1. can that method be done blind (without a
> display)? or does it only work in c
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Justin Petro
wrote:
> Thank you for finding this link... However, it indicates on that page
> that it can only be used if the lcd/backlight powers up. Mine sounds
> more like symptom 1. can that method be done blind (without a
> display)? or does it only work in c
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:14 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Right now just using the json module in python 2.6 may be best as the
> > parser is a C module (AFAIR).
> >
> > Is because of a bug in cjson why those files aren't being parsed?
>
Thank you for finding this link... However, it indicates on that page
that it can only be used if the lcd/backlight powers up. Mine sounds
more like symptom 1. can that method be done blind (without a
display)? or does it only work in cases where you can see the screen,
and get an actual error mess
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Right now just using the json module in python 2.6 may be best as the
> parser is a C module (AFAIR).
>
> Is because of a bug in cjson why those files aren't being parsed?
Re-reading this -- and given that yes, it's a bug in the cjson parser
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Justin Petro
wrote:
> I have since replaced the battery, unfortunately, it seems I also have
> the buggy bios which refuses to boot after the clock is reset.
Have you got a developer key? Have you seen -- and tried -- the
procedure involving a devkey, described in
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:33 AM, K. K. Subramaniam wrote:
> Keeping meta-data in the same directory (folder) is the way to go. Of course,
> the meta-data has to be a hidden file.
Of course - why?
> FWIW, www.freedesktop.org contains a bunch of "standards" (really
> conventions) for handling met
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Nandblaster_for_XO-1.5 records my current
thoughts about NANDblaster for XO-1.5. Please comment.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
30 matches
Mail list logo
