On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:08:09PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> --- On Sun, 4/25/10, James Cameron wrote:
> > Cool.? Looks like quite a bit of invested time
> > required if anyone wants
> > to use this ...
>
> ???
> could you clarify on the time investment?
Your documentation was not
--- On Sun, 4/25/10, James Cameron wrote:
> From: James Cameron
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tiny Core Linux for XO-1 and XO-1.5
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: "OLPC Devel" , fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com
> Date: Sunday, April 25, 2010, 8:54 PM
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:18:01AM
> -0700, Yi
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 05:43:29PM +0100, Tiago Marques wrote:
> XO 1 uses 8.2.0(767), that's the latest stable right?
Don't think so. When comparing XO-1 and XO-1.5, the version of XO-1
software I use is build 802, version 8.2.1.
> Ok, will do, thanks. For now it's mostly the darker image that'
What do you do with scan results that show an ad-hoc network is
available with the same name? Pick one:
1. show an access point icon for it (the current behaviour in os121),
2. show an ad-hoc mesh icon for it, with a badge showing that it is
active.
This might reduce the need to communicate t
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:00:27AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Fine with me. As others have raised this interest before. 'Our'
> sounds quite good to me. How about 'local'?
I did consider "Local" but decided against it because of the dual
meaning ... local to the computer, as in localhost.
-
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:05:02AM +0100, Tiago Marques wrote:
> Opened as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10133
Thanks! Closed as duplicate of #9913, let's move there. ;-)
The Sugar code doesn't see changes to the volume control made by other
applications. The Sugar code was designed to control
On 25 April 2010 03:16, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Right now, if you do clone of the olpc-update repo, and try to build
> it... well, it doesn't work very well.
Pretty sure you're looking at the wrong repo or something. The
Makefile has the right version number and you don't need to use
submodules.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:18:01AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> but I just build version 02 of tinycore linux for the XO-1 (see
> announcement here
> http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/TinyCore_for_XO1/Announce%20tc-xo_02%20for%20the%20XO-1.txt
> ) using the latest olpc kernel _unmodified_
James Cameron writes:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:19:39PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>> 2. I told build.py to run a script which removes the file I want to
>> get rid of (which is ${imgdir}/home/olpc/.sugar-update) - but the
>> script fails and complains this file is missing.
>
> My apologies. .suga
Current OFW has a bug in its delegated lease support
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10118 which affects one of our headline
features for the 10.x.y series.
Not sure how high antitheft ranks for 10.2.0 (10.1.1?)...
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Archit
Opened as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10133
Tiago
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Tiago Marques wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
>
>> tiago wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Just tested the new build and the sound widget is not updating the
>> sound
>> > level when
Just checked and this is exactly the same behavior of the XO-1.
Best regards
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tiago Marques wrote:
> It's an Iomega 160GB, which has a seagate drive inside, not sure which one.
>
> http://www.iomega.com/about/prreleases/2008/041708_media_xporter.html
>
> As I sai
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> tiago wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just tested the new build and the sound widget is not updating the sound
> > level when using the volume keys. Pressing the widget shows the slider,
> > which is set accordingly. This did work in previous ve
It's an Iomega 160GB, which has a seagate drive inside, not sure which one.
http://www.iomega.com/about/prreleases/2008/041708_media_xporter.html
As I said in the previous e-mail, the drive works fine, it just doesn't do
so when I have other devices plugged, which I understand may be normal given
14 matches
Mail list logo
