Re: Any issues with C in Sugar and XO?

2010-05-08 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 08.05.2010, at 11:12, Chris Ball wrote: > > Hi, > >> Hey, I am wondering if there are some major issues or technical >> problems that doesn't make Sugar compatible with C. For example, >> if a program is written in C, are there going to be at least some >> complications with running it? > > N

Re: Any issues with C in Sugar and XO?

2010-05-08 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, > Hey, I am wondering if there are some major issues or technical > problems that doesn't make Sugar compatible with C. For example, > if a program is written in C, are there going to be at least some > complications with running it? No. Several activities are currently written i

Any issues with C in Sugar and XO?

2010-05-08 Thread Abhishek Indoria
Hey, I am wondering if there are some major issues or technical problems that doesn't make Sugar compatible with C. For example, if a program is written in C, are there going to be at least some complications with running it? Can we run the program after installing gcc, but I don't think gcc wou

Re: XO-1.5 bad ogg experience

2010-05-08 Thread Kushal Das
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > The video does work absolutely great in the Jukebox activity. But > Jukebox is a story of its own. Firstly it doesn't associate mimetypes > so you can't open a video in Jukebox from the journal > http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1384 > > Seco

Re: #10045 HIGH 1.5-sof: XO-1.5 Record audio/video are out of sync with each other

2010-05-08 Thread Tiago Marques
Hi, I was just looking into this and the issue with SD cards' random write performance intrigued me in this particular case. Isn't recording being performed sequentially, hence no lag problem? At least, it should be somewhat mitigated, filesystem might be causing problems? Anyhow, I have been loo

Re: Fwd: XO 1.5 frequency scaling

2010-05-08 Thread Tiago Marques
> you're right. there's nothing in powerd related to clocking. powerd > limits itself to managing the display, wlan on/off, and system suspend. > Seemed so, thanks. > > > Did I miss some firmware or kernel update, as I can't load the c7 powersaver > > kernel module in a kernel I built myself.

Re: XO-1.5 bad ogg experience

2010-05-08 Thread Kushal Das
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > > well, i hope it won't be necessary, and that powerd's cpu utilization > heuristic will work well enough.  but if not, see: >  http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/pgf/powerd/tree/powerd#n170 > I don't have any hardware to test :( , so have to wait for

Re: Fwd: XO 1.5 frequency scaling

2010-05-08 Thread Paul Fox
tiago wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Tiago Marques > Date: Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM > Subject: Re: XO 1.5 frequency scaling > To: "Richard A. Smith" > > > Hi Richard, > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote: > > > On 05/04/2010 07:

Fwd: XO 1.5 frequency scaling

2010-05-08 Thread Tiago Marques
-- Forwarded message -- From: Tiago Marques Date: Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM Subject: Re: XO 1.5 frequency scaling To: "Richard A. Smith" Hi Richard, On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote: > On 05/04/2010 07:01 PM, Tiago Marques wrote: > > > Let me see if I

Re: XO 1.5 frequency scaling

2010-05-08 Thread Tiago Marques
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > martin wrote: > > > > Running powertop on your machine is hugely informational once you've > > read the powertop website docs. > > re: powertop -- with silbe's help our battery driver now provides > enough of the expected properties under /sys