On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:38:37AM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
But this was on channel 1. Can neighbors (or drive-bys) connect to
it?
Yes. Depending on what you mean by connect.
Anyone else in the vicinity [1] can obtain the laptop name [2] merely by
performing a passive scan [3].
Anyone
2010/5/30 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
El Wed, 12-05-2010 a las 16:49 -0400, Fernando Luis González Arriola
escribió:
Hoy, con el esfuerzo de todo el TEAM, pudimos lograr hacer (o mejor
dicho adaptar) un mega cargador, que se puede utilizar tranquilamente
hasta con 9 equipos a la vez
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:03, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I've reproduced no sharing over mesh on os240py.
Activity sharing works via access point.
Activity sharing works via Create new wireless network aka ad-hoc.
I can only think of two reasons for sharing not working in mesh
I can only think of two reasons for sharing not working in mesh but
presence yes:
- network congestion,
In my case, there appear to be no other radio signals present. If there
is network congestion, the XOs are generating it themselves.
- different link-local address setup,
What I
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 15:35, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
I can only think of two reasons for sharing not working in mesh but
presence yes:
- network congestion,
In my case, there appear to be no other radio signals present. If there
is network congestion, the XOs are generating
El Mon, 31-05-2010 a las 08:19 +1200, Tim McNamara escribió:
Just for my knowledge, does Fedora have an equivalent to Ubuntu's
long-term support releases?
Yes, it's called Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and it comes with commercial
support. If you want a free-beer equivalent with no guarantees,
It would be good to improve the situation, but as was discussed in the
past, yum does not seem to work very well on the XO. Manually tracking
the relevant upstream security updates would require some effort.
My own preference is to not work with static software - but to apply
as many updates
On 31 May 2010 00:03, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I've reproduced no sharing over mesh on os240py.
Activity sharing works via access point.
Activity sharing works via Create new wireless network aka ad-hoc.
I'm pretty sure this will be another case of there being no default
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:54:28PM -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
I'm pretty sure this will be another case of there being no default
multicast route.
Yep, that's it. Sugar is entirely relying on the existence of this
multicast route, and it is not present on os240py.
It can temporarily be added
Activity sharing works via access point.
Activity sharing works via Create new wireless network aka ad-hoc.
I'm pretty sure this will be another case of there being no default
multicast route.
I normally use wired ethernet, not wireless. Back some months, I asked
how come all the XOs on
os240py is based on Sugar 0.88, but months ago we were talking to you
about Sugar 0.84, so chances are there is a change to how presence is
transported.
os240py unmodified, without a multicast route, associated with mesh does
show XO icons in the neighbourhood view. Yet it does not show shared
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:59:49PM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
The answer I got was that the presence detection (or something)
capability used multicast, rather than depending upon standard
interface defined IP-addresses.
I've just booted one laptop on os240py to use mesh, but with packet
http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/soas/soas-i386-20100531.03.iso
(Pulled from rawhide)
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/i386/os/Packages/
0.88.0
Soas 3 Mirabelle
script created 4 GB USB ACER Aspire One Wireless (Apple
14 matches
Mail list logo
