Signed-off-by: Bernie Innocenti
---
modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc b/modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc
index 431ca3a..d7cf96b 100644
--- a/modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc
+++ b/modules/
On 19 August 2010 21:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Thu, 19-08-2010 a las 20:56 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
>
>> XS-0.6 and some of the package updates that come later fix a few bugs
>> related to ejabberd CPU/DB. I guess in Paraguay they are still on 0.5.
>
> Indeed. Three schools moved to 0.
El Thu, 19-08-2010 a las 20:56 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
> XS-0.6 and some of the package updates that come later fix a few bugs
> related to ejabberd CPU/DB. I guess in Paraguay they are still on 0.5.
Indeed. Three schools moved to 0.6 due to an HD crash and the 27 new
schools which are rece
Thanks for the patch, but these are already disabled within the very same file.
Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
> Directly from the OEM or on the open market?
>
Both.
- Ed
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:21 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD
> cards?
> > It's always useful to know what not to buy.
>
> I probably could, but variations between models f
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Ed McNierney wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>
> >> Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD
> cards?
> >> It's always useful to know what not to buy.
> >
> > I probably could, but variations between model
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>> Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD cards?
>> It's always useful to know what not to buy.
>
> I probably could, but variations between models from one manufacturer
> may be greater than variations between ma
On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
> Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD cards?
> It's always useful to know what not to buy.
I probably could, but variations between models from one manufacturer
may be greater than variations between manufacture
Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD
cards?
It's always useful to know what not to buy.
I'm assuming none of these cards don't have static wear levelling. Did any
manufacturer provide you details on that or are they only using spare blocks
for "repairability"?
An
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> A quick question here. Now that fedora has moved to git does it make
> any sense to follow their repo as the OLPC "master" and then have the
> XO customizations exist as a branch off of that? This should help
> leverage a lot of the work t
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:01, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Thanks for the advice. This is effectively the "399 patches" approach
>> I mentioned.
>
> Yes indeed. I couldn't tell if you knew about using format-patch and
> am separately -
>
>> Fo
>
> I'm in agreement that the right thing to do is rebase (as you
> outlined), especially after starting the process of doing this. This
> also means that merging linux-stable is OK (which is not a bad idea at
> all). And we should put more effort into upstreaming so that the
> amount of rebasing w
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. This is effectively the "399 patches" approach
> I mentioned.
Yes indeed. I couldn't tell if you knew about using format-patch and
am separately -
> For the 2.6.31 to 2.6.34 move, no rebasing happened. The 2.6.34 kern
On 19 August 2010 09:43, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> I think I know what you want -- and I'm an old git hand. Should be able to
> help
>
> You have an "oldish" 2.6.31 + patches and you want to "rebase" those
> onto 2.6.34, without getting tangled with. So the first step would be
>
> get the latest
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to use his work, given that it appears a
> big chunk of the work is already done. But there are 2 complications:
Hi Daniel
I think I know what you want -- and I'm an old git hand. Should be able to help
You have
On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:23 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:24 AM, John Watlington wrote:
>> Our experiment with SD/MMC cards as main storage continues.
>
> FWIW, I'm about two weeks into failure testing of 4G MLC compact flash
> from a couple of vendors. I'll update the
17 matches
Mail list logo
