On 10/20/2010 07:10 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hi Simon,
as in the past, should it be ~/public_rpms/10.1.3 ? Will that work?
Yes, using the public_rpms will work. They will end up under the name of
dsd then [1]. Mind that you have to use ~martin/public_rpms and not
On 20.10.2010, at 23:44, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 10/20/2010 07:10 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hi Simon,
as in the past, should it be ~/public_rpms/10.1.3 ? Will that work?
Yes, using the public_rpms will work. They will end up under the name of
dsd then [1]. Mind that you have to use
Hi list,
we are getting interesting news of not-quite-good content in Wikipedia
content included in the Wikipedia activities.
Unfortunately, there is a clear need to organise a facility to
audit/edit the wikipedia snapshots we have and repack the archive.
Do we have any easy way to do this? Is
On 22 October 2010 05:06, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
we are getting interesting news of not-quite-good content in Wikipedia
content included in the Wikipedia activities.
Schools wiki is quite good as it has images as well as text on 5000 pages of
curriculum (British)
On 10/21/2010 12:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Unfortunately, there is a clear need to organise a facility to
audit/edit the wikipedia snapshots we have and repack the archive.
Do we have any easy way to do this?
I'm the wrong person to answer this question, but the activity's archive
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Actually editing article text is not something we have attempted AFAIK.
And that's exactly what we need to do. We cannot blacklist vandalized
major 'distributor' pages. We cannot grab a new import just to audit
