Ok then, i think that patch you sent to the list is basically the same idea,
being able to switch it off (in a elegant way).
Is there someone I can bug to make sure that the patch you sent gets
included? :)
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
martin wrote:
On
I don't think that is the problem. The windows
instruction manual lists resolutions up to 1920x1...@16bits
so it would not be a device limitation unless it is the linux
driver that introduces the limitation.
As I mentioned, I was able to get what appeared to
be 1280x...@16bit to run but the
martin wrote:
Ok then, i think that patch you sent to the list is basically the same idea,
being able to switch it off (in a elegant way).
Is there someone I can bug to make sure that the patch you sent gets
included? :)
first someone needs to agree that it might do what i say it does,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:53 AM, jns-cmarsh...@comcast.net wrote:
I don't think that is the problem. The windows
instruction manual lists resolutions up to 1920x1...@16bits
Try it out if you want. I don't think you'll be impressed.
You can push it past 1024x768 -- it's just not a happy
2010/12/20 Kevin Mauricio Benavides Castro webmaster.ac@gmail.com:
te explico un poco acerca de las pruebas que lleve acabo en en tres XO
A devel@lists.laptop.org por favor :-)
m
--
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with
lo que estoy mirando también es que cuando hago el comando
copy-nand u:\os359.img y coloco mi usb con mi llave de desarrollador y
logra arrancar tomando que dentro de mi usb hay
u:\os359.img
u:\os359.crc
u:\Security/develop.sig
ahora si yo reinicio la XO y elimino estos archivos y solo
El 20 de diciembre de 2010 13:08, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.orgescribió:
lo que estoy mirando también es que cuando hago el comando
copy-nand u:\os359.img y coloco mi usb con mi llave de desarrollador y
logra arrancar tomando que dentro de mi usb hay
u:\os359.img
u:\os359.crc
martin.langh...@gmail.com said:
I don't think that is the problem. The windows
instruction manual lists resolutions up to 1920x1...@16bits
Try it out if you want. I don't think you'll be impressed.
You can push it past 1024x768 -- it's just not a happy place.
The pixel count is only a
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:
The pixel count is only a factor of 3. Is it just slow or does something
else happen?
Only a factor of 3 on a bandwidth limited bus. Joy!
From the original author's page
I released Q4A10, but you should not use it unless your name is Quanta.
It is for the A2 board build. It will not work on any boards
currently in existence.
I am sending this message in case someone happens to find it and somehow
misses all the Do Not Use warnings on the web page.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:11 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
I would recommend that you use a class 6 or class 10 full size SD card for
this purpose.
One of the Sandisk Extreme III cards, for example. The extra cost
11 matches
Mail list logo