zhashfs: write first block last

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Drake
on the zhashfs patch? http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20110320/zhashfs-first-block-last.patch Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: 11.2.0 development build 14 released

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Drake
On 19 March 2011 17:16, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: updates.laptop.org now offers this stream. Instructions are on the 11.2.0 page above. Unfortunately this doesn't work. Files such as /etc/shadow and /etc/gshadow are now installed from Fedora with permissions 000. rsyncd on

Re: zhashfs: write first block last

2011-03-20 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Sun, Mar 20 2011, Daniel Drake wrote: 1. Is this approach a good idea? Sounds great to me. 2. Are we bothered by a misleading WARNING message appearing at the end of the flashing process for those running on old/current firmware? (a firmware update would fix this in future) I expect

Re: zhashfs: write first block last

2011-03-20 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 3/20/2011 6:58 AM, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, On Sun, Mar 20 2011, Daniel Drake wrote: 1. Is this approach a good idea? Sounds great to me. 2. Are we bothered by a misleading WARNING message appearing at the end of the flashing process for those running on old/current firmware? (a

Re: 11.2.0 development build 14 released

2011-03-20 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:52 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 19 March 2011 17:16, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: updates.laptop.org now offers this stream. Instructions are on the 11.2.0 page above.

Re: 11.2.0 development build 14 released

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Drake
On 20 March 2011 18:05, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: so fakeroot (at least debian/unstable's version of fakeroot) should be able to handle this just fine. You're right, this should work. But it doesn't, even with fakeroot 1.14.5. Test case: As root: mkdir test echo closed

Re: 11.2.0 development build 14 released

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Drake
On 20 March 2011 18:46, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: So..tar must be doing something different from chmod when applying permissions. It uses openat() with O_CREAT and the mode parameter. fakeroot doesn't catch openat(), nor open(). Daniel ___

Re: 11.2.0 development build 14 released

2011-03-20 Thread Michael Stone
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 at 18:46:12 +, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 20 March 2011 18:05, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: so fakeroot (at least debian/unstable's version of fakeroot) should be able to handle this just fine. You're right, this should work. But it

Re: 11.2.0 development build 14 released

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Drake
On 20 March 2011 20:53, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote: ...and, sure enough, we have a bug [1] entitled fakeroot: handle openat() and friends. Thanks, I was just looking at that as well. The patch doesn't actually implement an openat() override (presumably because there was no open()

Re: [OLPC-AU] copy-nand vs update-nand

2011-03-20 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 04:24:03PM +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote: On 17 March 2011 18:21, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: copy-nand is for unpartitioned jffs2 images. update-nand is for partitioned jffs2 images, or partitioned combined jffs2 and ubifs images. Follow the

L10n of non-Sugar build elements

2011-03-20 Thread Chris Leonard
As current XO builds come with a boot into GNOME UI option, we should be considering the localization process of those UI elements as well. I am guessing (and only guessing) that the PO/MO files are pulled from upstream in the build process. It would be highly desirable to develop a complete