Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar versions - Activities

2012-01-06 Thread Chris Leonard
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Probably many of them continue working in new Sugar versions, but didn't have a release in a long time. Yes.. May be a good work for a group of volunteers, is check the activities marked working in old

Re: [Sugar-devel] 883 on XO1

2012-01-06 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:46:25AM +, Alec Muffett wrote: Lacking that has anyone got an equivalent hash-the-blocks-based binary diff tool, or does one just need to be written? rdiff or rsync is what I would use. But all such tools require some effort to explain, or in David's case, to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar versions - Activities

2012-01-06 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
If I test some.. Where put the results? sugar-devel is a good place Gonzalo ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] 883 on XO1

2012-01-06 Thread Chris Leonard
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:26 AM, David Leeming da...@leeming-consulting.com wrote: So i conclude I have just thrown USD 85 down the toilet. Ouch, David, I will happily keep you supplied with pre-tested OLPC image downloads (by snail-mail CD-ROM) in exchange for some help recruiting localizers

XULRunner 1.9 On OLPC Horizontal Scroll Bar Issue

2012-01-06 Thread anthony
Hello there; I encountered an issue when using the XULRunner 1.9.1.9, the default version of XULRunner on the OLPC computers. No horizontal scroll bar appears when text extends beyond the width of the screen. I installed XULRunner 8.0 and called my XULRunner application from this newer

Re: XULRunner 1.9 On OLPC Horizontal Scroll Bar Issue

2012-01-06 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
The plan is move to webkit. Gonzalo On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:56 PM, anth...@evolutionindesignz.com wrote: Hello there; I encountered an issue when using the XULRunner 1.9.1.9, the default version of XULRunner on the OLPC computers. No horizontal scroll bar appears when text extends beyond

Re: XULRunner 1.9 On OLPC Horizontal Scroll Bar Issue

2012-01-06 Thread Manuel QuiƱones
2012/1/6 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org: The plan is move to webkit. More information, here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/WebKit Gonzalo -- .. manuq .. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org

RE: [Sugar-devel] Sugar versions - Activities

2012-01-06 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
It would be good to record the date fo last release. There could be translations committed to git but not in the release if it was a long time ago. This could be checked against the release date and the git log activity since. I add another column to my spreadsheet (1) called 'Last of:'

RE: [Sugar-devel] 883 on XO1

2012-01-06 Thread David Leeming
Hi Chris! Working on a neat repair with James - will report back how it goes. Cheers for the support! Let me know off list on the localising. David -Original Message- From: Chris Leonard [mailto:cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, 7 January 2012 12:59 a.m. To: David Leeming

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar versions - Activities

2012-01-06 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: It would be good to record the date fo last release. There could be translations committed to git but not in the release if it was a long time ago. This could be checked against the release date and the git log

Re: [Sugar-devel] 883 on XO1

2012-01-06 Thread James Cameron
(we have discovered that only a tiny part of the file is corrupted ... so far one part in 128). -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] 883 on XO1

2012-01-06 Thread Chris Leonard
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:22 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: (we have discovered that only a tiny part of the file is corrupted ... so far one part in 128). So only about 70 cents worth. cjl ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] 883 on XO1

2012-01-06 Thread James Cameron
The method used was to take a checksum of each of 128 parts of the file, compare the checksums, and then transmit only the corrupted part. This recovery method is only applicable if the file size matches, but the checksum does not. I've written this up at