Re: 11.3.1 development build 31 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2012-03-23 Thread Hal Murray
> Thanks, I've fixed this for XO-1/XO-1.5 now. > In 11.3.1 the build download path changed from e.g.: >http://build.laptop.org/11.3.0/os8/xo-1.5/ > to: >http://build.laptop.org/11.3.1/os31/xo1.5/ > so I've updated the pattern used by the update server to no longer use the > "-" for 11.3.1

Re: Re: 11.3.1 development build 31 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2012-03-23 Thread forster
Thanks XO1.5 updated OS880 -> 31 OK Tony > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 23 2012, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > Updated XO1.75 29-> 31 OK > > > > Xo1.5 failed > > > > [olpc@xo-e0-8d-68 /]$ sudo olpc-update 11.3.1_xo1.5-31 > > Downloading contents of build 11.3.1_xo1.5-31. > > @ERROR: unknown module

Re: 11.3.1 development build 31 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2012-03-23 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Fri, Mar 23 2012, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > Updated XO1.75 29-> 31 OK > > Xo1.5 failed > > [olpc@xo-e0-8d-68 /]$ sudo olpc-update 11.3.1_xo1.5-31 > Downloading contents of build 11.3.1_xo1.5-31. > @ERROR: unknown module 'build-11.3.1_xo1.5-31': None > rsync error: error starting cli

Re: Re: 11.3.1 development build 31 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2012-03-23 Thread forster
Updated XO1.75 29-> 31 OK Xo1.5 failed [olpc@xo-e0-8d-68 /]$ sudo olpc-update 11.3.1_xo1.5-31 Downloading contents of build 11.3.1_xo1.5-31. @ERROR: unknown module 'build-11.3.1_xo1.5-31': None rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at main.c(1516) [Receiver=3.0.8] Could n

11.3.1 release candidate 1 (build 884) released

2012-03-23 Thread Martin Langhoff
We're pleased to announce our first release candidate of our 11.3.1 software release. This first RC only supports XO-1.75 -- next RC will also support XO-1 and XO-1.5. We apologize for the inconvenience, which will be cured shortly. Information and installation instructions can be found here: htt

NOW: OLPC Contributors Program Mtg (on #olpc-meeting, 3PM EDT, Mch 23)

2012-03-23 Thread Holt
Please all join us now, voting for the latest OLPC/Sugar community projects over IRC Live Chat, to make the best project allocations & mentoring relationships--starting right here: http://forum.laptop.org/chat AGENDA: * Fast Review of the 7 latest (greatest!) HW/Project Proposals. Plz join us

Re: New boot animation for 12.1.0

2012-03-23 Thread Frederick Grose
Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Gonzalo Odiard > wrote: > > I compared os5 and os883 side by side and os883 is a lot faster to boot. > > I understand is not all plymouth time, but would be good if we can avoid > > increasing boot time. > > M

Re: New boot animation for 12.1.0

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > I compared os5 and os883 side by side and os883 is a lot faster to boot. > I understand is not all plymouth time, but would be good if we can avoid > increasing boot time. Make sure you are testing post-first-boot in both cases, with both

Re: New boot animation for 12.1.0

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> >> However, due to the overall boot time decrease, and increase in >> startup parallelization, I'm seeing that we have very little time to >> do anything animated. The initramfs starts the animation and then >> boots the rest of the system,

Re: New boot animation for 12.1.0

2012-03-23 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > > However, due to the overall boot time decrease, and increase in > startup parallelization, I'm seeing that we have very little time to > do anything animated. The initramfs starts the animation and then > boots the rest of the system, providing a window of maybe 3-4 seconds > while we animate

IN 2 WKS: OLPC/Sugar Doc Sprint Apr 6-10 in Boston

2012-03-23 Thread Holt
Thanks to the dozen great writers/communicators who've RSVP'd and committed to attend! I've posted all your flight dates here: http://j.mp/xomanual#People Fantastic News -- 3 absolutely stellar volunteers have stepped forward keeping us all on track: 1) Before the sprint, Mark Battley

Re: Video chat activity (was: Re: C and Sugar/GTK)

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mar 22, 2012 4:32 PM, "Alex Waterman" wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > After looking at Empathy and the empathy-gtk library, it would seem that its a dead project as far as an installable libempathy-gtk.so type thing. I asked the telepathy mailing list about this and they said that it is now just sta