On 2012-11-06, at 23:50, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> Ah, thanks. I wasn't even going to file a bug report about the aliasing
>> because that is a limitation inherent to the kind of sensor we have.
>
> There are of course limitations, but
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> Ah, thanks. I wasn't even going to file a bug report about the aliasing
> because that is a limitation inherent to the kind of sensor we have.
There are of course limitations, but we are in the process of tuning
and tightening things on t
--- On Tue, 11/6/12, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> sounds like http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12272
>
Yes. That's the one.
Sorry for the repetition. I guess missed it.
>
> > Updated an XO-1 and an XO-1.75 from os7 to os9 and
> would appear that the first reboot software update still has
> som
sounds like http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12272
> Updated an XO-1 and an XO-1.75 from os7 to os9 and would appear that the
> first reboot software update still has some issues.
> When the process is initiated as prompted at the 1st boot post-update, the
> progress bar stops after the first or se
Updated an XO-1 and an XO-1.75 from os7 to os9 and would appear that the first
reboot software update still has some issues.
When the process is initiated as prompted at the 1st boot post-update, the
progress bar stops after the first or second activity, and looks like froze
though the process c
