On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 09:48 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > Think I found the problem, in powerd we're setting WOL based on this
> > > string:
> > >
> > > if grep -qi ": :14B2
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 09:48 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Think I found the problem, in powerd we're setting WOL based on this
> > string:
> >
> > if grep -qi ": :14B2" /proc/net/tcp
> >
> > but that string is not present in /proc/n
Thank you for the report.
I have confirmed this and filed http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12430
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With F18 moving to firewalld as the default firewalling method this has
> rendered powerd's netactivity iptables chain to NOT be loaded
Hi all,
With F18 moving to firewalld as the default firewalling method this has
rendered powerd's netactivity iptables chain to NOT be loaded at all.
How to reproduce:
sudo iptables -S
note that netactivity chain is not present.
sudo rpm -e firewalld
reboot
sudo iptables -S
note that netact
To the best of my knowledge, the XO-1.75 and XO-4 have no hardware-level
x86 compatibility. They use processors that use the ARM architecture.
If you absolutely need x86 support on these platforms and cannot
recompile/rebuild code, the qemu platform might be able to help.
In the past OLPC has wo
I'm pretty sure the answer is no, but just to confirm is there Adobe Flash
support for either XO-4 or XO-1.75? Also is there x86 compatible XO-4 or
XO-1.75 in production?
Thanks and happy new year.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lis
