Re: XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:35:34PM -0400, Kevin Gordon Gmail wrote: Perhaps silly Q... Any benefit just putting swap and static content on the SD? No question is silly. ;-) I'm guessing you are asking about performance, or response times. If so, the short answer is no. Details below. If

interesting new battery technology

2015-04-08 Thread John Watlington
Aluminum and Graphite, in an aqueous solution. Can’t wait till it hits the market! http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-32204707 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread Kevin Gordon Gmail
Perhaps silly Q... Any benefit just putting swap and static content on the SD? Kg Sent from my currently functioning gadget    Original Message   From: James Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 19:31 To: devel@lists.laptop.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; support-g...@lists.laptop.org

Re: XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread James Cameron
What benefit is an SD card on an XO-1? My tests of about 400 starts show some benefit of using an SD card, on activity startup time. The benefits are: - boot time was decreased by several seconds; because of reduced demand for memory, - first activity start after boot was decreased by

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would like to replicate the results. I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some results with our builds. git clone

Ubuntu uxo

2015-04-08 Thread Jhon Diaz
How would I make a build for xo-1 using uxo tool from git Thanks ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel