On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:36 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:08:38AM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
I was unable to reproduce on 13.1.0.
My apologies - I wrote without realizing that I haven't experience
this with recent 13.1.0 builds (but I do remember it
I was unable to reproduce on 13.1.0.
df /var/tmp had shown 51200 blocks.
Then I changed /etc/fstab to increase size=50m to size=60m and
rebooted.
df /var/tmp now shows 61440 blocks.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
I was unable to reproduce on 13.1.0.
My apologies - I wrote without realizing that I haven't experience this
with recent 13.1.0 builds (but I do remember it on 13.1.0 - maybe it was
on the initial builds).
I definitely do currently experience the too-small-tmp-size with my
(customized)
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:08:38AM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
I was unable to reproduce on 13.1.0.
My apologies - I wrote without realizing that I haven't experience
this with recent 13.1.0 builds (but I do remember it on 13.1.0 -
maybe it was on the initial builds).
No worries. Yes, I
Since the recent discussion of which release is most reliable for remote
deployments, I've started actually putting 12.1.0 to use in place of
11.3.1. One thing I notice is that (despite me customizing /etc/fstab
with entries having reasonable size= values), on both 12.1.0 and
13.1.0 'df'
