Re: Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-24 Thread Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
I did the following as a basic test for memory usage of various python modules. I did the test on my computer, a 32-bit Centrino laptop running ubuntu. Let's start with the following code: import gobject mainloop = gobject.MainLoop() mainloop.run() Cost: 1.2MB of memory (1.2MB

Re: Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-24 Thread david
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote: I did the following as a basic test for memory usage of various python modules. I did the test on my computer, a 32-bit Centrino laptop running ubuntu. Let's start with the following code: import gobject mainloop =

Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also tried using ps_mem.py to compare memory used by processes, but the method that ps_mem.py uses has changed as a result of kernel change. http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/2008-08-22-ps-mem/ has the samples that I took,

Re: Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-23 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cerebro is running there for some reason (I've seen it in another bug report already). I can't reproduce on a clean 2328 joyride, not sure if it has been fixed or something weird is going on. Cerebro is enabled in

Re: Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cerebro is running there for some reason (I've seen it in another bug report already). I can't reproduce on a clean 2328 joyride, not sure

Re: Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-23 Thread Ton van Overbeek
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cerebro is running there for some reason (I've seen it in

Re: Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-23 Thread pgf
ton van overbeek wrote: Also idle suspend is enabled again in 2325, while it should be off. i think this was intentional. now that we're building separate release (Subject: New release8.2 build 7nn) and joyride streams, idle suspend was re-enabled in joyride in order to help continue flushing

Re: Cerebro (was Re: Almost 50% less free memory in joyride-2302 compared with Update.1 (708))

2008-08-23 Thread Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: 6.5 Mib according to ps_mem You are right, it's enabled in joyride... it's failing for me because it can't find msh0 (not sure why). Marco I filed #8128 to address the memory usage that seems excessive. I have also disabled cerebro from start-up while this