On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4 - Support time frame.
GS - I agree that release should be supported until the second
subsequent release is out (ala Fedora). Do we have consensus on that?
+1
Is it useful for the rest of you already working on the
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:20, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Stable collaboration :) I know this is a hard one.
We just put Cerebro into joyride. We think that some activities, such as
Read, will be easy to modify to use it. You might try it and see. Which
activities do you care
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:26, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bryan Berry wrote:
3) Stable collaboration :) I know this is a hard one.
We just put Cerebro into joyride. We think that some activities, such as
Read, will be easy to modify to use it. You might try it and see. Which
Hi All,
Thanks for all the comments on the Development Process.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home
A few gentle suggestions on managing the input.
A - My intention is that this page
(http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home) will be the final page.
So please put comments and
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for all the comments on the Development Process.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home
A few gentle suggestions on managing the input.
A - My intention is that this page
Ar 29/06/2008 am 11:20, ysgrifennodd Tomeu Vizoso:
Michael Stone wrote:
Bryan,
Thanks very much for the detailed feedback. Here are my comments:
1) Be able to remove activities to free up space, including activities
that come pre-installed.
Noted. Can you or Bernie supply a
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and I formally request synchronizing our release schedule
with Fedora's.
That would be good, how can we do it though? A short 8.3 in
c. scott ananian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and I formally request synchronizing our release schedule
with Fedora's.
That would be good, how
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c. scott ananian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and I formally request synchronizing our
c. scott ananian wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why is it necessary or optimal that we track every fedora release?
it seems like a requirement that's both ambitious, and somewhat
arbitrary.
I personally think that it's good to keep your
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I posted a first pass Release Process Overview.
See: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home
Thank you.
Its based on work done by Michael and others on this list. It needs a
lot more work, but I hope we
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted a first pass Release Process Overview.
We don't seem to have any process for translating textbooks and
content. There are teacher training
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose a '8.1+peru-2' system for referring to combinations of core OS
+ activities
I tend to agree. Exposing the raw number of the
Jun 2008 11:31:06 -0400
From: Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: First Draft Development Process Proposal
To: devel@lists.laptop.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi All,
I posted a first pass Release Process Overview.
See: http
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted a first pass Release Process Overview.
See: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home
I'd added a number of comments to that page.
Major points: I recommend adopting Fedora's freeze definitions, I
propose a
Michael, thanks for your responses.
Michael wrote:
Noted. Can you or Bernie supply a patch which accomplishes the desired
behavior? If someone can come up with a halfway decent patch, I'm more
than happy to try to see that this gets resolved.
I will have to ask Bernie for help w/ this. It is
Hi All,
I posted a first pass Release Process Overview.
See: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home
Its based on work done by Michael and others on this list. It needs a
lot more work, but I hope we can start using it soon and improve it over
time.
I could use help fleshing it out and
17 matches
Mail list logo