Ar 13/06/2008 am 00:23, ysgrifennodd Michael Stone:
> Marco, Dennis, and I talked this afternoon and evening about how to
> arrange our Koji tags for the 8.2.0 release. Assuming no serious
> objections are raised by either you or the Fedora infrastructure and
> release-engineering teams, we will ta
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 08:06:04AM -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
I believe that you are correct that the URLs in /etc/yum.repos.d/olpc*
are incorrect for our F-9 work.
Dennis?
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listin
> Is the piece we're missing the correlation with koji branches /
> repository names?
One problem I have with the current olpc3-19 build is that when I
use 'yum', it offers to download some packages named "f7".
Should the /etc/yum.repos.d in olpc3-19 be limited to "f9" only ?
mikus
___
On Friday 13 June 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Questions? Complaints? Pet peeves?
>
> I'd rather rename our build roots to either correspond to fedora
> releases or to olpc releases. It seems that the 'olpc2, olpc3,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Questions? Complaints? Pet peeves?
I'd rather rename our build roots to either correspond to fedora
releases or to olpc releases. It seems that the 'olpc2, olpc3, ...'
numbering is a historical accident only, and just er
Marco, Dennis, and I talked this afternoon and evening about how to
arrange our Koji tags for the 8.2.0 release. Assuming no serious
objections are raised by either you or the Fedora infrastructure and
release-engineering teams, we will take the OLPC-3 [1] CVS branch,
freeze the dist-olpc3 tag, and
