Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Pah, looks like it tried every 15 minutes over night but did not stop sending out mails ... I now changed the script to only send out mail when a new successful build is found that actually has any changed package versions. - Bert - On Oct 28, 2007, at 22:24 , Bert Freudenberg wrote: > The

Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Bert Freudenberg
The script now looks explicitly for "Calling out the done script" to indicate success or "Deleting incomplete OS image" for failure. If neither line is found, it tries again 15 minutes later. And since you're back to normal schedule I enabled the message for every build ... - Bert - On Oct

Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Mitch Bradley
Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Mitch Bradley wrote: > > >> Perhaps we should reconsider the wisdom of hourly builds, or quit >> sending hourly change reports, or something. >> > > > ...or not running new builds unless the datestamps of the source > directories say something has changed? > > B

Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Bert Freudenberg
I just re-reran it and it picked up those builds fine. I suspect a race - it detects the new build directory, but the log is not up yet. I'll see if I can avoid the race ... - Bert - On Oct 28, 2007, at 21:49 , Michael Stone wrote: > Bert, > > Builds joyride-129 and joyride-131 look finished

Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Michael Stone
Bert, Builds joyride-129 and joyride-131 look finished to me but your script reported them as failed. This is probably due to changes that I made recently (#4251 and #4253) but I don't know enough about how your script works to be certain. Do you have any ideas on what's going on? Michael P.S.

Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On Oct 28, 2007, at 21:34 , Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Mitch Bradley wrote: > >> Perhaps we should reconsider the wisdom of hourly builds, or quit >> sending hourly change reports, or something. > > > ...or not running new builds unless the datestamps of the source > directories say something ha

Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Bernardo Innocenti
Mitch Bradley wrote: > Perhaps we should reconsider the wisdom of hourly builds, or quit > sending hourly change reports, or something. ...or not running new builds unless the datestamps of the source directories say something has changed? But anyway, I always wanted some way to do "I want a b

Re: New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Mitch Bradley
Bert Freudenberg wrote: > http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build131/devel_jffs2/ > > ! Build incomplete > This is starting to get a bit annoying. We need to do something to prevent hourly annoying messages. Perhaps we should reconsider the wisdom of hourly builds, or qui

New joyride build 131

2007-10-28 Thread Bert Freudenberg
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build131/devel_jffs2/ ! Build incomplete -- This email was automatically generated Aggregated logs at http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/joyride-pkgs.html ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org ht