Re: OFW RPM packaging

2009-11-26 Thread Daniel Drake
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:36 -0500, Richard A. Smith wrote: The person who build/releases the firmware (me or mitch) would modify the spec files we have for the firmware and then build the rpm. Editing the spec file is manual but I have some scripts that automate making and releasing the

Re: OFW RPM packaging

2009-11-26 Thread Daniel Drake
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:40 +, Daniel Drake wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:36 -0500, Richard A. Smith wrote: The person who build/releases the firmware (me or mitch) would modify the spec files we have for the firmware and then build the rpm. Editing the spec file is manual but I have

OFW RPM packaging

2009-11-25 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, How did RPM packaging of OpenFirmware work in previous OLPC OS release cycles? Who did it, and how? We need to restart this process for http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9573 http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9628 I'm happy to help out, but knowing what happened previously would be useful. Daniel

Re: OFW RPM packaging

2009-11-25 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Daniel, From memory when I've looked at this in the past it was packaged within OLPC from the binary download. I've had on my list at one point being able to follow the instructions to recompile it from source so it could be included explicitly upstream in Fedora but have never got around to

Re: OFW RPM packaging

2009-11-25 Thread Richard A. Smith
Hi, How did RPM packaging of OpenFirmware work in previous OLPC OS release cycles? Who did it, and how? The person who build/releases the firmware (me or mitch) would modify the spec files we have for the firmware and then build the rpm. Editing the spec file is manual but I have some

Re: OFW RPM packaging

2009-11-25 Thread Richard A. Smith
From memory when I've looked at this in the past it was packaged within OLPC from the binary download. I've had on my list at one point being able to follow the instructions to recompile it from source so it could be included explicitly upstream in Fedora You mean just including the source?