I'm working do duplicate this part presently by setting up a gentoo on
the OLPC to make sure I'm not missing anything.
Outside of that I'll try out OSMesa.
-Bryan
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Bryan Duff wrote:
>
>> After compiling in mesa source to get GLX working on the FC7-based
>> builds. Run
Hi,
> There should be no particular reason why Ubuntu would have better
> *software* GL rendering performance than Fedora, although hardy
> ships with gcc 4.2, which could make a big difference.
glxgears opens a window, but the software rendering performance will
depend not just on that
Bryan Duff wrote:
> After compiling in mesa source to get GLX working on the FC7-based
> builds. Running `glxgears -fullscreen` I get ~25 fps. Compared to
> Ubuntu which gets 65 fps, this is rather poor.
One last thing: I'm very curious about this disparity: could
you please provide more detail
(please forgive minor mistakes as I was in a hurry and
I had no time to double-check some of the facts reported
below. Feel free to point out corrections, of course).
Bryan Duff wrote:
> After compiling in mesa source to get GLX working on the FC7-based
> builds. Running `glxgears -fullscreen` I
Bryan Duff wrote:
> After compiling in mesa source to get GLX working on the FC7-based
> builds. Running `glxgears -fullscreen` I get ~25 fps. Compared to
> Ubuntu which gets 65 fps, this is rather poor.
>
> I think the Ubuntu performance shows that 3D (albeit simple 3D) is very
> possible and w
After compiling in mesa source to get GLX working on the FC7-based
builds. Running `glxgears -fullscreen` I get ~25 fps. Compared to
Ubuntu which gets 65 fps, this is rather poor.
I think the Ubuntu performance shows that 3D (albeit simple 3D) is very
possible and worthwhile.
I've tried the amd
