so after the 8.2.1 release the plan is to just switch to standard Linux
distros?
Speaking entirely as a volunteer: the answer depends on who you ask.
Since I think that 8.2.0 wasn't half bad, I'm currently trying to persuade
people who feel similarly to work with me to assemble an 8.2.2 with
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
so after the 8.2.1 release the plan is to just switch to standard Linux
distros?
What follows is my understanding of what Ed and cjb mean when they
talk about future releases...
Instead of a 9.1 done in the old way, staff and volunteers set
I would like to see a java update.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
so after the 8.2.1 release the plan is to just switch to standard Linux
distros?
Speaking entirely as a volunteer: the answer depends on who you ask.
Since I think that 8.2.0 wasn't half
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Michael Stone wrote:
so after the 8.2.1 release the plan is to just switch to standard Linux
distros?
Speaking entirely as a volunteer: the answer depends on who you ask.
sorry if I seem like a pest, and I definantly do appriciate the volunteers
here, but what I am
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
so after the 8.2.1 release the plan is to just switch to standard Linux
distros?
What follows is my understanding of what Ed and cjb mean when they
talk about future releases...
Instead of a
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:16 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
the first step is to track down the remaining XO only things
that's what the 'fedora-olpc' mailing list has been all about for a while now.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:16 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
the first step is to track down the remaining XO only things
that's what the 'fedora-olpc' mailing list has been all about for a while now.
grumble grumble fedora centric US developers ;-)
I'm
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:53:03AM -0800, da...@lang.hm wrote:
I'm glad to hear it's been going on, I would have expected such things
here on the OLPC developer list. are the folks working on other distros
(debxo, ubuntu, gentoo that I know of) aware of the work happening on the
fedora-olpc
(changing subject ...)
On 06.02.2009, at 11:13, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Michael Stone wrote:
so after the 8.2.1 release the plan is to just switch to standard
Linux
distros?
Speaking entirely as a volunteer: the answer depends on who you ask.
sorry if I seem like a
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
(changing subject ...)
It would seem to me that deployments will get to choose which software
to install.
snip/
[like] Luke's XOOS (http://lukego.livejournal.com/tag/xoos) is immature but
cool
Hah! Yes that would
2009/2/6 da...@lang.hm:
sorry if I seem like a pest, and I definantly do appriciate the volunteers
here, but what I am trying to understand here are the plans of the olpc
orginiztion itself. it's one thing to transition the maintinance of the
Sugar UI to an outside orginization, it's
Hi Bert,
We have had fixed Etoys / Squeak-VM packages ready for many months
now, they just did not make it into 8.2 by a few days, and 8.2.1
was scheduled to be only a major-bugs fixing release, so we were
holding out for 9.1. Since that is not going to happen we would
very
On 05.02.2009, at 18:46, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Bert,
We have had fixed Etoys / Squeak-VM packages ready for many months
now, they just did not make it into 8.2 by a few days, and 8.2.1
was scheduled to be only a major-bugs fixing release, so we were
holding out for 9.1. Since that is not
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Dear Release Manager,
as we discussed on IRC today (and which I had not realized until
today) the 8.2.1 release will be pre-installed on XOs for much longer
than anticipated, since the 9.1 release has been canceled, and no
replacement is in sight.
David -
The 9.1 release was a very specific release planned for the first
half of 2009 - see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/9.1.0 for one set of
details - following OLPC's stated plan of two major releases per
calendar year. That specific event is not going to happen. That's
not at all the
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Ed McNierney wrote:
The 9.1 release was a very specific release planned for the first half of
2009 - see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/9.1.0 for one set of details - following
OLPC's stated plan of two major releases per calendar year. That specific
event is not going to
Dear Release Manager,
as we discussed on IRC today (and which I had not realized until
today) the 8.2.1 release will be pre-installed on XOs for much longer
than anticipated, since the 9.1 release has been canceled, and no
replacement is in sight.
We have had fixed Etoys / Squeak-VM
17 matches
Mail list logo
