-Original Message-
From: dextrose-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto:dextrose-
boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Innocenti
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 2:34 AM
To: Sridhar Dhanapalan
Cc: OLPC Devel; OLPC Australia list; Dextrose
Subject: Re: [Dextrose] Support
On 5 June 2011 17:02, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Fedora 14 is still shipping xulrunner 1.9.2, which is roughly equivalent
to the version used by Firefox 3.6. Backporting things from Fedora 15 is
going to be a royal pain in the ass, since they have switched everything
to Gnome
-Original Message-
From: Sridhar Dhanapalan [mailto:srid...@laptop.org.au]
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 3:42 AM
To: Bernie Innocenti
Cc: David Farning; OLPC Devel; OLPC Australia list; Dextrose
Subject: Re: [Dextrose] Support for Firefox 3.5 is ending
On 5 June 2011 17:02, Bernie
On 5 June 2011 12:07, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Would that mean that if we were to upgrade to FF4, we would have a disparity
in
rendering between GNOME and Sugar?
The issues becomes one of cost benefit. What is the cost of OLPC, AC, or
individual deployments
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 15:50 +1000, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
(sorry - sending again because I had the wrong address for the olpc devel
list)
Firefox 3.5 is being EOLed by Mozilla[0] and Google is dropping
support for it[1]. In 10.1.3 this is default Web browser in GNOME and
the backend
(hey, is the clock of your computer set correctly? your message appears
to be one day old!)
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:37 -0400, David Farning wrote:
There was some discussion at EduJam. Browse is currently unmaintained, but
Simon Schampijer and Gonzalo Odiard expressed interest in working on
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 17:42 +1000, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
On 5 June 2011 17:02, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Fedora 14 is still shipping xulrunner 1.9.2, which is roughly equivalent
to the version used by Firefox 3.6. Backporting things from Fedora 15 is
going to be a
