Re: Marvell microkernel replacement

2008-01-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 02:30 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: David Woodhouse writes: http://www.csr.com/products/unifirange.htm They claim that that is a 1-chip solution. Is it really? I have no reason to believe otherwise -- why do you ask? Some people make some fairly preposterous claims

Re: Marvell microkernel replacement

2008-01-13 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Jan 13, 2008 6:42 AM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 02:30 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: David Woodhouse writes: http://www.csr.com/products/unifirange.htm They claim that that is a 1-chip solution. Is it really? I have no reason to believe otherwise

Re: Marvell microkernel replacement

2008-01-12 Thread David Woodhouse
http://www.csr.com/products/unifirange.htm -- dwmw2 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: Marvell microkernel replacement

2008-01-12 Thread Albert Cahalan
David Woodhouse writes: http://www.csr.com/products/unifirange.htm They claim that that is a 1-chip solution. Is it really? Marvell uses a 2-chip solution. If a 2-chip solution is OK, then one could start with a 1-chip softmac solution and add any arbitrary processor. That CPU could be ARM,