Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-16 Thread Bobby Powers
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Just thought I'd post my understanding of where the packages are at based on the list that was created at FUDCon For reference see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC/Packages_for_F11 Also there's the OLPCDelta

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-16 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 14:25 -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Just thought I'd post my understanding of where the packages are at based on the list that was created at FUDCon For reference see

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:31, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: sugar-evince - Probably need to get evince split into evince-libs and evince so that sugar-evince can build against evince-libs. Not sure if there's plans to get sugar-evince upstreamed for easy maintenance Yesterday

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:15, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: - xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora package) - Mario Simon I have seen that in trunk the native theme can be enabled and disabled in runtime, so that would be one patch less. I'm not 100%

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
sugar-evince - Probably need to get evince split into evince-libs and evince so that sugar-evince can build against evince-libs. Not sure if there's plans to get sugar-evince upstreamed for easy maintenance Yesterday was working in upstreaming our patches. I really really hope that we can

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:15, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: - xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora package) - Mario Simon I have seen that in trunk the native theme can be

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: sugar-evince - Probably need to get evince split into evince-libs and evince so that sugar-evince can build against evince-libs. Not sure if there's plans to get sugar-evince upstreamed for easy maintenance Yesterday

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:15, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: - xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
- xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora package) - Mario Simon I have seen that in trunk the native theme can be enabled and disabled in runtime, so that would be one patch less. I'm not 100% sure it got into 1.9.1, though. Do you know if there's a upstream

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-14 Thread Peter Robinson
Just thought I'd post my understanding of where the packages are at based on the list that was created at FUDCon For reference see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC/Packages_for_F11 Also there's the OLPCDelta tracking bug in RHBZ 462625 for quick tracking of the ones I'm aware of. KOJI