On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:10 AM, genesee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Drake-5 wrote:
We're mid-way through the upgrade to sugar-0.83. And even when that's
done, there will be mucho breakage (see Tomeu's earlier post).
I think joyride will break often over the course of the next few
Aw, you're no fun! Since first upgrading from 656 to Update 2, there is no
turning back.
Warnings are so droll. So far nothing in joyride has been fatal. Not getting
rid of me so easy!
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Genesee: If your XO is your only computer, then please don't use
joyride at all.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:46 AM, genesee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aw, you're no fun! Since first upgrading from 656 to Update 2, there is no
turning back.
Warnings are so droll. So far nothing in joyride has been fatal. Not getting
rid of me so easy!
Oh, in that case, keep trying explosive
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
genesee writes:
NetworkManager-0.7 and/or NetworkManager-glib killed my Neigborhood view.
Same problem here.
We're mid-way through the upgrade to sugar-0.83. And even when that's
done, there will be mucho breakage (see
Daniel Drake-5 wrote:
We're mid-way through the upgrade to sugar-0.83. And even when that's
done, there will be mucho breakage (see Tomeu's earlier post).
I think joyride will break often over the course of the next few
months as development runs in full swing.
Thanks for letting us
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Had to install these two from F9:
NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.11.svn4175.fc9.i386.rpm
NetworkManager-glib-0.7.0-0.11.svn4175.fc9.i386.rpm
Howdy,
NetworkManager-0.7 and/or NetworkManager-glib killed my Neigborhood view.
After 'olpc-update' to joyride-2532, 'yum
genesee writes:
NetworkManager-0.7 and/or NetworkManager-glib killed my Neigborhood view.
Same problem here. But I'm using a wired ethernet connection --
and with this new NM this is the FIRST time ever that my wired
connection is being correctly re-established following a suspend !!
mikus
Hi again,
I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a joyride branch
similar to faster that sugar developers could administer by ourselves.
In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and Sugar
developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC hardware.
Sounds good?
Hi,
Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
administer by ourselves.
In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and
Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC
This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.
- Ed
On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
administer by ourselves.
In that way we wouldn't be
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.
Awesome, how much time would it take to get implemented?
Thanks,
Tomeu
On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Masters of Joyride,
have built updated sugar rpms and they seem to work fine on last joyrides.
Marco pointed me out in #sugar that work fine may need some
clarification. In fact, the following things are known to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
