Re: [IAEP] Security and long life issues (Was Re: XO-2)

Javier, it would help if your messages were shorter and more to the point. I find it very difficult to follow your writing and reasoning especially with this many parenthetical remarks, and generally don't know how to respond even when you're discussing a topic that interests me (e.g. secu

Re: [IAEP] Security and long life issues (Was Re: XO-2)

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:49 AM, ffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Are we creating the new "slaves of the XO"? or this is a gadget that >> they can forget in some years? >> > Nope. > > That's what developer keys are > for. Indded

Re: [IAEP] Security and long life issues (Was Re: XO-2)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Are we creating the new "slaves of the XO"? or this is a gadget that > they can forget in some years? > Nope. That's what developer keys are for. -FFM ___ Devel mailing list Devel@list

Security and long life issues (Was Re: XO-2)

Richard et al, (I am passing this to the education list... because it is a mix of tech issues with issues related to the general policy about the XOs / and OLPC). I agree with the level of security that you are talking about. And I understand what are your concerns (some of them are valid for P