On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:05:44PM +0700, Yang Ha Nguyen wrote:
No, I have not. I don't have an XO to try, but according to what you
have specified:
Ah, right, that's frustrating, because your comment is based on no
evidence of testing, and therefore I can't use it for refining my build.
On
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:00:59AM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:39:32PM +0700, Yang Ha Nguyen wrote:
Puppy Linux should be better than Ubuntu on XO since it's much more
lightweight.
Sounds like you haven't tried what I built then. I've not included
everything Ubuntu
happening in puppy linux for the XO?
Puppy is largely derived from Ubuntu. (last time I checked)
david
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:24 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Announcing XO-1.5 Ubuntu desktop and minimal builds, based on 10.04
lucid and the maverick testing suite that should
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:39:32PM +0700, Yang Ha Nguyen wrote:
Puppy Linux should be better than Ubuntu on XO since it's much more
lightweight.
Sounds like you haven't tried what I built then. I've not included
everything Ubuntu includes.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
Pretty interesting!
Have you seen the recent work happening in puppy linux for the XO?
Puppy is largely derived from Ubuntu. (last time I checked)
david
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:24 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Announcing XO-1.5 Ubuntu desktop and minimal builds, based on 10.04
Announcing XO-1.5 Ubuntu desktop and minimal builds, based on 10.04
lucid and the maverick testing suite that should lead to 10.10.
The desktop build is GNOME based, is 284 MB compressed, 814 MB
installed, and is built on a 2 GB partition size.
The minimal build avoids X and contains only text
protects which I feel need to be nudged
into moving forward and I am just 'putting my money where my mouth
is' to make it happen.
david
Have you installed, or tried to install vanilla(ish) Ubuntu on an
XO-1.5? If yes, which version? What install process? Did it work?
Drivers missing our outdated
upstream-downstream conversation than most people
think.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-maverick-edubuntu-packages
Regards,
Tomeu
david
Have you installed, or tried to install vanilla(ish) Ubuntu on an
XO-1.5? If yes, which version? What install process? Did it work
-packages
Regards,
Tomeu
david
Have you installed, or tried to install vanilla(ish) Ubuntu on an
XO-1.5? If yes, which version? What install process? Did it work?
Drivers missing our outdated? Did you have to grab custom packages?
(which ones?)
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh
it to an older release.
But of course, a PPA might be good enough for the moment.
Regards,
Tomeu
david
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-maverick-edubuntu-packages
Regards,
Tomeu
david
Have you installed, or tried to install vanilla(ish) Ubuntu on an
XO-1.5
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Curious minds want to know...
Have you installed, or tried to install vanilla(ish) Ubuntu on an
XO-1.5? If yes, which version? What install process? Did it work?
Drivers missing our outdated? Did you have
martin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Curious minds want to know...
Have you installed, or tried to install vanilla(ish) Ubuntu on an
XO-1.5? If yes, which version? What install process? Did it work?
Drivers missing our
On 06/14/2010 02:46 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
a lot of work was done for ubuntu on XO-1. much of that work might be
applicable as well. i don't have a link handy, i'm afraid.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ubuntu_Lucid_on_OLPC_XO?
--
Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org
One Laptop per Child
13 matches
Mail list logo
