On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:56 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
We found that erase commands sent to certain microSD cards would fail.
We removed the erase commands from the start of fs-update. This would
have worked against you.
Ouch! I hadn't realized we had removed the commands
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:36:15AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Sridhar - the changes (and the fix James proposes) apply to the
internal organization of the .zd files. So the fix willbe in the OOB
toolchain.
Applied, #11776.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 09:46 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:36:15AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Sridhar - the changes (and the fix James proposes) apply to the
internal organization of the .zd files. So the fix willbe in the OOB
toolchain.
Applied, #11776.
Is
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 06:58:00PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 09:46 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:36:15AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Sridhar - the changes (and the fix James proposes) apply to the
internal organization of the .zd files. So
Perhaps I misunderstood, but I thought that fs-update had been
modified to make the XO unbootable unless the process was allowed to
complete. I think this was achieved by blanking the first block and
only writing it properly at the end.
I am finding that XOs that have received an incomplete
No, fs-update was not modified for this.
zhashfs in olpc-os-builder was modified to place the zero block last in
the .zd file. This would have worked in your favour.
We found that erase commands sent to certain microSD cards would fail.
We removed the erase commands from the start of fs-update.
