I'll take a look at these documents, thanks. Or [yet] another look, for the RFCs.
Still, as far as I am concerned, library has a different * notion of identifiers * relation between identifiers and resources * delivery mechanism as http. Cheers, David On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 11:40 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > "New URI Schemes: 99% Harmful" > <http://infomesh.net/2001/09/urischemes> > > A specification SHOULD reuse an existing URI scheme (rather than create > a new one) when it provides the desired properties of identifiers and > their relation to resources. > <http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme> > > If you're positive that you need a new URI scheme, please do it > properly: consult <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2717.txt> and > <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2718.txt> for details. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel