On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:04:52AM -0500, Kevin Gordon wrote:
Thanks for this detailed update. If i may summarize, if one is
using a 12 or 13 O/S on any architecture, I'm assuming the
recommended f/w is the most current, whether on XO-1, 1.5, 1.75 or
4. If running 11, well, one is on their
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:04:52AM -0500, Kevin Gordon wrote:
Thanks for this detailed update. If i may summarize, if one is
using a 12 or 13 O/S on any architecture, I'm assuming the
recommended f/w is the most
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 05:16:31PM -0500, Kevin Gordon wrote:
Well, as much as it would be fun to throw Mr. Holt under the bus on
this, I must do the mea culpa. :-) I volunteered to lend Tim and
him a slew of XO-1's to do AP testing, but I asked for him to
confirm that if I had to roll back
I used to do this all the time while testing XO-1s with different
firmwares, but want to check if the _process_ of rolling back firmware on
XO-1s is dangerous to the machine in general:
1) Are there risks to the _process_ of rolling back XO-1 firmware, EG from
q2f19 to q2e48 (Release 11.3.0) as
From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org
Date: Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: [support-gang] is rolling back firmware dangerous? (on XO-1s
especially)
To: Community Support Volunteers -- who help respond to \help AT
laptop.org\ support-g...@lists.laptop.org
Cc: Adam Holt h...@laptop.org
From: Adam HoltSent: Friday, February 7, 2014 20:12To: Devel's in the DetailsSubject: Fwd: [support-gang] is rolling back firmware dangerous? (on XO-1s especially)From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.orgDate: Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:17 PMSubject: Re: [support-gang] is rolling back firmware
