>> Suppose I have a file 'foobar.img' on an USB stick. On an unsecured
>> XO, I'm at the 'ok' prompt. What is the difference between using
>> 'copy-nand u:\foobar.img' versus using 'update-nand u:\foobar.img" ??
My question regarded an unsecured XO -- I have /security/develop.sig
on the (instal
> Suppose I have a file 'foobar.img' on an USB stick. On an unsecured
> XO, I'm at the 'ok' prompt. What is the difference between using
> 'copy-nand u:\foobar.img' versus using 'update-nand u:\foobar.img" ??
>
> Thanks, mikus
>
update-nand performs the secure update procedure that uses "
Suppose I have a file 'foobar.img' on an USB stick. On an unsecured
XO, I'm at the 'ok' prompt. What is the difference between using
'copy-nand u:\foobar.img' versus using 'update-nand u:\foobar.img" ??
Thanks, mikus
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lis
