On 10/12/08, Carlos Nazareno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey OLPC team.
No, really, is there any chance OLPC can ship Gnash 0.8.4 with XO OS
final 8.2.0?
Very doubtful.. this Gnash release is several weeks too late to meet
8.2.0. We froze things quite a while ago.
My suggestion would be to find
On Oct 13, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 10/12/08, Carlos Nazareno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey OLPC team.
No, really, is there any chance OLPC can ship Gnash 0.8.4 with XO OS
final 8.2.0?
Very doubtful.. this Gnash release is several weeks too late to meet
8.2.0. We froze
On Oct 13, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Robert Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btu end users could install them and have them work if gnash 0.8.4
was
available.
If end-users have to drop to a command line and do something, which I
assume
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really do not get it do you!! The basic functionality should be
provided by OLPC with a build of gnash optimized for the Geode.
I'm glad to hear that 0.8.4 will result in a significantly better
experience for XO
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:57:57PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really do not get it do you!! The basic functionality should be
provided by OLPC with a build of gnash optimized for the Geode.
I should note that I'm
For the record, I consider Dan to have spoken authoritatively on this
matter. As he says, the best things that you can do now are to
demonstrate that the newer gnash can safely be deployed either via 'yum
update', via 'olpc-update', or by providing a custom installation script
Our release
Hey OLPC team.
No, really, is there any chance OLPC can ship Gnash 0.8.4 with XO OS
final 8.2.0?
I tend to agree with Russ, It'll hurt more to ship Gnash 0.8.3 with
8.2.0 than Gnash 0.8.4 RC1.
Latest Gnash trunk is at
http://gnashdev.org/dev_snapshots/gnash-trunk-9980.tar.tgz and it'll
go final
