Wait! Can we share Measure data between laptops and combine the streams?
--
Exactly!
(Im working on it, however patch submissions and developmental help
most welcome)
Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
--
Edward Cherlin
End Poverty at a Profit by teaching
4. It is unfortunate that a respected conference did not do a
better job at vetting this paper.
The conference is a small USENIX workshop (Usability, Psychology and
Security). USENIX workshops generally involve fewer than 100
participants, more timely work, and less pre-publication peer
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6864
successfully reproduced the error and have uploaded all the log files
and output errors I could. hope this helps.
So far I am having a lot of issues w/ 703, I don't recommend it for
Update.1 release. 702 had a lot less issues
Bryan
OLE Nepal
Kathmandu
I take back my criticisms of 703. looks like the problems stemmed from a
corrupted .olpc.store/ directory on my usb key. same usb key caused same
problem on 702
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:04 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6864
successfully reproduced the error and have
Hi,
2008/4/8 Robson Mendonça [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
Could you please copy it to wiki.laptop.org?
Yep! I did it. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/AMADIS
Thanks!
What do you mean by update the XO through the web? You mean
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olpc-update ?
Yep again. I don't know if
FYI, this might crop up.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Talk:Bitfrost#org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied
Basically, don't choose the solution of making both users have the
same uid. -- Charles Merriam
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:24 AM, John Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At OLE Nepal we need
Thanks for formalising this, I would also strongly suggest that the
organisation is moved to the far right, and that we get rid of year.
component major minor bugfix organisation
I strongly suggest we keep the year.
Yes, really, OLPC should release new software at least once per year.
It
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1852
Changes in build 1852 from build: 1850
Size delta: 0.00M
-loudmouth 1.2.3-2.fc7
+loudmouth 1.3.4-1.olpc2
--- Changes for loudmouth 1.3.4-1.olpc2 from 1.2.3-2.fc7 ---
+ New upstream version for joyride
--
This mail was
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1852
Changes in build 1852 from build: 1850
Size delta: 0.13M
-loudmouth 1.2.3-2.fc7
+loudmouth 1.3.4-1.olpc2
--- Changes for loudmouth 1.3.4-1.olpc2 from 1.2.3-2.fc7 ---
+ New upstream version for joyride
--
This mail was
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday we had a mini-sprint with argentinian pythonistas and we
discussed Alecu's CDPedia which is a Python toolchain that does are
good job of cutting a slice of wikipedia and cutting off the least
interesting
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice to see a python toolchain for this (though I don't see any code at
that url?) They exist in other languages as well. We've been working with
Linterweb's Kiwix (kiwix.org) and the Schools-Wikipedia, which use their
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola, Alecu. ¿Como esta?
Hola Edu, muy bien, muchas gracias. ¿Como estás vos?
Is there a design spec for CDPedia?
Yes, but it's mostly in spanish. But I see you may have no problem with it! ;-)
Hi SJ,
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see the auto-selection code; I don't find it in the trunk atm.
We played with some sample code, and have a bunch of ideas on the
design docs, but the auto-selection is not finished yet.
I do see hints of
The most represive school systems we have been talking
to have been the ones in the U.S.They even claim that they
have a legal obligation to break internet access on the
laptop everywhere but the school, to ensure compliance
with the law.
I personally configured the server to not log IP
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Charles Merriam wrote:
Thanks for formalising this, I would also strongly suggest that the
organisation is moved to the far right, and that we get rid of year.
component major minor bugfix organisation
I strongly suggest we keep the year.
Yes, really, OLPC
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 10:32 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Charles Merriam wrote:
Thanks for formalising this, I would also strongly suggest that the
organisation is moved to the far right, and that we get rid of year.
component major minor bugfix
2008/4/10 Martin Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How about a two digit (zero-padded) version number that started with 08?
The release date is data that belongs elsewhere -- and it's not
accurate, a long-term-
What you need is the critical information when you are deciding
whether to install/update
Has anyone done any work on building XENified images for XO?
I'm interested in this for building a large-scale virtualized XO
environment for testing purposes.
The other option is to run the XO image in HVM mode, but that limits
which processors
I can use to host such a thing.
Cheers
--
Do you expect to make a major change to the API more than once per year?
Would you like major changes to the server API to release
contemporaneously with other components?
Do you want subtle, minor changes to the API made over a year ago to
be the cause of difficult to diagnose problems?
Do you
There's been some talk about building for multiple platforms:
Aside from the XO-1 hardware, various other builds with advocates
include Linux builds:
Ubuntu (widely used for Actitivies development),
Fedora 7 jh-build variant (widely used for OS and systems development),
Gentoo, Cebian,
Attached you'll find a trivial script to concat-and-sort various lease
files. This makes life easier for regional teams that deal with
various shipments.
Usage:
cat-leases.pl */lease.sig all_leases.sig
do we have a random-grabbag-o'scripts git repo where this would belong?
cheers,
I doesn't seem that this is a firmware issue then.
M
- Original Message -
From: Zarro Boogs per Child [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04/10/2008 09:03 PM GMT
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #6869 HIGH Never A: Firmware release - 5.110.22.p9
#6869: Firmware release - 5.110.22.p9
Agreed. The date doesn't need to be in the build #, and only makes it
longer.
And I don't know how meaningful it is to have a build named OLPC -- as
noted a few times, we are building more than one thing. If anything, that
should be a clarifier at the end noting that OLPC was the 'customizer' of
Yes, starting from .p8 is what we should do now.
.
- Original Message -
From: Zarro Boogs per Child [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04/10/2008 09:16 PM GMT
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #6869 HIGH Never A: Firmware release - 5.110.22.p9
#6869: Firmware release - 5.110.22.p9
Redundancy is not bad. There are people who care about year (it is far
easier to remember that the last time I updated was 2 years ago, than
remember the build number then) and they should have something to hold on
to. I vote including the year in addition to whatever else, but not using
it to
2008/4/10 Jameson Chema Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Redundancy is not bad. There are people who care about year (it is far
easier to remember that the last time I updated was 2 years ago, than
remember the build number then) and they should have something to hold on
to. I vote including the year
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Bryan Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have looked at all 3 docs and they look good
have some comments
1. Who is in charge of Sugar? the team lead. I remember that Blizzard
used to be the team lead. Is it JG now?
Actually, is there a way to find out who
And what happens if we go one revision back?
M
- Original Message -
From: Zarro Boogs per Child [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04/10/2008 09:03 PM GMT
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #6869 HIGH Never A: Firmware release - 5.110.22.p9
#6869: Firmware release - 5.110.22.p9
Thank you for sharing this discussion. Upon reading it I had two questions.
*Sugar.* I have seen offers on this list from a class ofuniversity
graduate students to do usability testing. Maybe someone responded to them
privately. (That would have been perfectly appropriate.) But in reading
M,
Release 22p6 is not affected.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what happens if we go one revision back?
M
- Original Message -
From: Zarro Boogs per Child [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04/10/2008 09:03 PM GMT
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #6869
I second Carol's pragmatic approach. What we should do is to use access
points in schools whenever possible. The mesh network was not designed to
compete with infra-structure. It was designed to be used when there is no
infra-structure.
That being said, I will keep repeating myself that
2008/4/10 Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I second Carol's pragmatic approach. What we should do is to use access
points in schools whenever possible. The mesh network was not designed to
compete with infra-structure. It was designed to be used when there is no
infra-structure.
Don't worry
There was been strong Etoys experiment going in Illinois, especially
at Columbia College and UIUC. I don't know how much olpc-chicago
overlaps with that group, but it would be nice to be able to say that
we already have been doing the test of (a part of) software long time
in the state.
--
Yeah, in testing today, 22.p8 was failing amazingly in school mesh mode.
I'm writing up and posting the logs/traces. I'll announce them when
done.
wad
On Apr 10, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
M,
Release 22p6 is not affected.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:02 PM, [EMAIL
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was been strong Etoys experiment going in Illinois, especially
at Columbia College and UIUC.
Excellent. Can you point us to some groups or individuals, or
published documents, or whatever?
I don't know how much
35 matches
Mail list logo
