n Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First Michael:
This feels very similar to an RFC.
GS - Its not meant to be an RFC
I think Michael was just suggesting a time-saving device: you defined
should, must, etc, and there's a common standard for that kind of
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:47, Morgan Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:42, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any follow-up on the idea of having a precise list of maintainers for
all Sugar activities? Even just the email address from the git repo
would be nice.
A quick note on my experiences with joyride-2228 on my sister's
G1G1 XO. She was running 703 before I convinced her to
update to joyride for the new user interface. She really likes
that but she now has the problem of sticking control key.
Given that the problem only started on the OS +
c. scott ananian wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've been slowly moving my g1g1 machine forward to joyride (from 656).
i had customized it quite a bit, and am trying to restore those changes.
i've got xfce running, but a couple of yum dependencies
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 13:10 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm perfectly willing to do this work but how I can be sure
it will actually be used?
What do we need to do to get libabiword updated?
sugar-jhbuild uses an ancient patched tree dating from November last
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:22:51 -0700
Deepak Saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Cozybit has been working on new thinmac firmware for the Libertas
chip that allows use of the chip in hostmode and I've built it
against our Joyride kernels so that others can play around with it
and provide
My only question is whether this should be @lists.laptop.org or
@lists.sugarlabs.org. Please comment, or I will make it the latter by
default.
I think the latter makes sense, activities are meant to work with Sugar
and not the XO in particular.
Shikhar
G1G1, Joyride 2241. In one Terminal session started mplayer -- it
was playing a movie. Went to another Terminal session, and entered
some commands. Noticed that not all of the text on that screen was
equally distinct - some of it was paler than others. Noticed that
*which* text was paler
It is the video chip's feature that it can display a video overlay over
the RGB bitmap. The pixels where the overlay can be seen is defined by a
colorkey (what was 0xFF00FF in the example), or the alpha component of
the display RGB bitmap (not used on the XO since the change 16 bit
bitmaps).
Morgan Collett writes:
We didn't get to discuss this activity developers' mailing list
at the Sugar meetings. However I've had no negative feedback.
If anyone is opposed to this list, please speak up quickly and
loudly. Otherwise I will get it created in the next week,
publicize it and
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2244
Changes in build 2244 from build: 2242
Size delta: 0.13M
-sugar 0.81.8-1.fc9
+sugar 0.81.8-1.1.fc9
-sugar-artwork 0.81.3-1.olpc3
+sugar-artwork 0.81.3-1.1.fc9
--- Changes for sugar 0.81.8-1.1.fc9 from 0.81.8-1.fc9 ---
+ Local
8.1.2 may be used for the next G1G1 factory image but that's not final
yet either.
#6532 is a blocking bug against the next G1G1 release which is not fixed
in 709. It is considered by G1G1 donors who have commented in that
ticket to be NOT SUITABLE for mass distribution to G1G1.
Michael
On 8/2/08, Alejandro Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
is it possible to browse the neighborhood witn the OLPC emulator (on
qemu) to discover other XOs and emulated XOs? (over a wi-fi network)
My first attempt showed me an empty neighborhood view on the
emulated XO altough the
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 16:47 +0200, J.M. Maurer wrote:
What version is actually being shipped with sucrose? What do we
need to do to get it updated?
Someone should just update jhbuild... i could do that when i find some
spare time and motivaten; feel free to beat me to it.
Updated
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:32:11PM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eben Eliason wrote:
| Is it possible that we could
| simply have a P_ROOT permission as well, or does that blow Bitfrost out of
| the water?
1. According to my reading of
Shikhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My only question is whether this should be @lists.laptop.org or
@lists.sugarlabs.org. Please comment, or I will make it the latter by
default.
I think the latter makes sense, activities are meant to work with Sugar
and not the XO in particular.
Let's say that the list will be used for:
- announce new activities
- announce changes in ownership
- check for dead/agonizing/orphaned activities
- discuss API and dependancies issues
- ...
I think there are many reasons to get such a list.
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the
As you can see, the present security difficulties stem from the lack of
effort spent on recording user intentions about what permissions should
be applied to what activities. Signatures do absolutely nothing to
address this problem -- they only permit an as-yet undesigned system
interpreter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastien wrote:
| - announce new activities
| - announce changes in ownership
| - check for dead/agonizing/orphaned activities
| - discuss API and dependancies issues
All of these things are perfect for [EMAIL PROTECTED] They are precisely what
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 03:03:24PM -0600, Jameson Chema Quinn wrote:
As you can see, the present security difficulties stem from the lack of
effort spent on recording user intentions about what permissions should
be applied to what activities. Signatures do absolutely nothing to
address this
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2245
Changes in build 2245 from build: 2241
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpc-utils 0.81-1.olpc3
+olpc-utils 0.82-1.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
As above, hashes can be computed on the unpacked activity bundles. No
modification to the bundle format is necessary; moreover, why would you
ever rely on the correctness of a manifest supplied by the bundle
itself?
The current manifest format hashes everything in a directory. That includes
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2245
Changes in build 2245 from build: 2244
Size delta: 7.34M
-olpc-utils 0.81-1.olpc3
+olpc-utils 0.82-1.olpc3
+gnome-icon-theme 2.22.0-6.fc9
--- Included gnome-icon-theme version 2.22.0-6.fc9 ---
--
This mail was automatically
Look, there is no reason to care about hashes. What is the fear
here, that the jffs2 filesystem will fail? We have pathnames.
Permissions are granted by the user. The only exception is when
the OS is initially installed, or when the whole OS is upgraded.
Permissions are tied to an inode. Since
Booted faster 2344 (manually upgraded from 2343). In Sugar, pressed
'rotate' button. XO screen went white, no controls worked except
for holding the power button down for four seconds -- to power off.
mikus
___
Devel mailing list
On 2 Aug 2008, at 22:59, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Booted faster 2344 (manually upgraded from 2343). In Sugar, pressed
'rotate' button. XO screen went white, no controls worked except
for holding the power button down for four seconds -- to power off.
Yea, this was reported a week or so ago,
It is the video chip's feature that it can display a video overlay over
the RGB bitmap. The pixels where the overlay can be seen is defined by a
colorkey (what was 0xFF00FF in the example), or the alpha component of
the display RGB bitmap (not used on the XO since the change 16 bit
bitmaps).
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 05:10:54PM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastien wrote:
| - announce new activities
| - announce changes in ownership
| - check for dead/agonizing/orphaned activities
| - discuss API and dependancies issues
All
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Nicholas Bodley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed Jul 30 7:17 , Walter Bender sent:
Welcome to the project.
Localization is more that string translation. In particular, there is
work to be done to improve the RTL rendering in Sugar. Do you know of
any Python
Eben wrote:
There has been lots of confusion about the difference between mesh and APs.
They're really not the same at all, apart from the fact that they both
depend on the radio. The new design no longer treats the mesh channels as
objects in the Neighborhood view. Instead, there will be
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2246
Changes in build 2246 from build: 2245
Size delta: 0.00M
-rainbow 0.7.17-1.fc9
+rainbow 0.7.18-1.fc9
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 11:50:59PM -0400, Build Announcer v2 wrote:
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2246
Changes in build 2246 from build: 2245
Size delta: 0.00M
-rainbow 0.7.17-1.fc9
+rainbow 0.7.18-1.fc9
This build partially resolves the original #6797 issue but is
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2246
Changes in build 2246 from build: 2245
Size delta: 0.00M
-rainbow 0.7.17-1.fc9
+rainbow 0.7.18-1.fc9
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/faster-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 12:00:18AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
If anyone knows how to get rainbow to stop when X dies; please speak
up!
Yes, up!
I've looked at rainbow on 2228 and 2246.
I've looked at the process with strace and lsof, and at the source on
the XO, and it appears that rainbow
From: root [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
README | 105
1 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 README
diff --git a/README b/README
new file mode 100644
index 000..95c9a53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README
@@
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 04:42:58PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
Scott and Michael raised the question of why we didn't build it as a .xo
only project with no need for server. I explained the constraints of
time and image in Uruguay and they understood that.
There were less convinced that it should
Michael, how did you envision publishing a blog on the Internet without the
use of a server? The kids are using the write activity to compose their
posts. I'm confused by your comment.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 04:42:58PM
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 12:45:24PM -0700, Carol Lerche wrote:
Michael, how did you envision publishing a blog on the Internet without the
use of a server? The kids are using the write activity to compose their
posts. I'm confused by your comment.
Carol,
I'm sorry I confused you. I envisioned
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stated most clearly in Scott's Network
Principles document.
The principle outlined there is interesting, but we are slowly trying
to prove it is also workable. So I would not task Tarun with
delivering something usable to Uy
39 matches
Mail list logo
