Jim Gettys wrote:
Note that I'm not advocating in favor of soldered NAND - in fact I've
been one of the leading proponents of migrating to an SD-based storage
solution. I'm just pointing out that, if you're willing to buy an SD
card now (which is necessary for the SD-based swap solution),
[adding sugar-devel as this is of interest also outside OLPC]
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 23:49, Mildred Ki'Lya ml.mildred...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm new here, and I came interested in the OLPC project because it's a
wonderful computer, very well integrated, and I just had one via
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:52, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
[adding sugar-devel as this is of interest also outside OLPC]
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 23:49, Mildred Ki'Lya ml.mildred...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm new here, and I came interested in the OLPC project because
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 10:52 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso a écrit :
[adding sugar-devel as this is of interest also outside OLPC]
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 23:49, Mildred Ki'Lya ml.mildred...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm new here, and I came interested in the OLPC project because it's
Le samedi 20 décembre 2008 à 18:13 -0200, Martin Langhoff a écrit :
Hi Guillaume,
Hi Martin,
Badlop has posted a new patch that I want to test. It conflicts with a
patch you've introduced to our build,
recent_online_and_rearby_groups_updated.diff -- two questions
- Do we need this patch
Hi Jordan,
Looks like we made a little more progress on graphics benchmarking. See
Neil's results below.
I updated the feature page with the test results so far:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/General_UI_sluggishness
What's next?
Do we know enough now to target a particular section
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated an XO from 703 to 8.2 with the latest olpc-update, and to my
disappointment the journal content was wiped. Is this to be expected?
It shouldn't wipe the Journal, but if the new Journal code finds an
error when
Ed,
I made http://dev.laptop.org/report/39?TIME=80 in the image of one
of my old 8.2.0 reports. (TIME is the number of seconds of history that
you want to view so that URL shows you all changes to tickets with
milestone 8.2.1 made in the last 9-10 days).
At the time of this writing, over the
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:57:56PM -0500, Ed McNierney wrote:
Michael -
Are we able to promptly and regularly generate 8.2.1 builds that reflect
the work being done?
For basic testing purposes, yes. Scott's weekend report indicated that
he set up a 'staging' build stream on xs-dev. You can
Michael -
Are we able to promptly and regularly generate 8.2.1 builds that
reflect the work being done? From last week's reports I get the
impression that various bits of progress are being made, but we've had
no 8.2.1 builds since the first one.
If there is anything you (or anyone else)
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Ed McNierney edmcnier...@gmail.com wrote:
Are we able to promptly and regularly generate 8.2.1 builds that
reflect the work being done?
Yes. All completed work should be packaged and put in
public_rpms/staging for testing, with an appropriate changelog.
Staging
Le dimanche 21 décembre 2008 à 07:40 -0500, Bernie Innocenti a écrit :
Hello,
Hello,
I've just converted these two packages to the new font packaging
guidelines, but then I realized I didn't make an ideal maintainer
because I don't use them and I can't even read those languages :-)
Greg Smith wrote:
Hi Jordan,
Looks like we made a little more progress on graphics benchmarking. See
Neil's results below.
I updated the feature page with the test results so far:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/General_UI_sluggishness
What's next?
Do we know enough now
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2605
Changes in build 2605 from build: 2604
Size delta: -1.97M
-libertas-usb8388-firmware 2:5.110.22.p18-1.olpc2
+libertas-usb8388-firmware 2:5.110.22.p23-1.olpc3
-nash 6.0.71-2.fc10
+nash 6.0.71-3.fc10
-sugar-artwork
Greg Smith wrote:
Hi Jordan,
Looks like we made a little more progress on graphics benchmarking. See
Neil's results below.
I updated the feature page with the test results so far:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/General_UI_sluggishness
What's next?
Do we know enough now
+sugar-base 0.83.2-2.olpc4
Good to see this up-leveled -- the previous version of this package
as distributed in Joyride was more than a month old.
However, that still leaves several packages which appear to be more
recent in 'olpc3' than in 'olpc4'. Output of 'yum check-update' :
|
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 15:36 -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
You might want to re-acquire the numbers with wireless turned off and
the system in a very quiet state. If you want to be extra careful, you
can run the benchmarks in an empty X server (no sugar) and save the
results to a ramfs
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Leeming
leem...@pipolfastaem.gov.sb wrote:
- 0.5 version downloaded on 19/11/08 (note if there is an update this might
be significant, it is difficult to download 500MB in this region)
You can update with yum, enabling the olpcxs-updates repo, like
yum
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Guillaume Desmottes
guillaume.desmot...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
- Do we need this patch to interop with 8.2 correctly? What does it do?
IIRC, this patch introduced new type of shared roster: @online@,
@recent@ and @nea...@. Vanilla ejabberd only supports
19 matches
Mail list logo
