Is there a way to tweak the os300 build so that it brings up the
Libertas device just as eth0
I presume you are asking about installing a distribution which embodies
that definition - I myself do not understand how to modify the build
process. But if the question refers only to hacking an
On 12 July 2010 19:27, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I'm still unconvinced that this is worth changing, given the additional
work that it will cause.
I'd like to hear from the heavy users of trac, in particular Chris (cjb),
Daniel (dsd), and Paul (pgf).
I think our current system
Hello
This is my bio - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Vishal
I would like to propose the following activity for XO -
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/VedicMaths , please feel free to comment.
I even seek a mentor for the same.
VISHAL GARG
___
Linux User # 487206
Web
On 12 July 2010 17:59, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to tweak the os300 build so that it brings up the
Libertas device just as eth0 (and doesn't enable the 802.11s features
in the firmware)?
Just curious, why?
The usual NetworkManager methods (if
why would you want to know what tickets were closed
as part of work toward a particular release?
Let me give an answer from the user's perspective (I'm seconding what
Martin's response said):
Consider build 800 versus build 802. Suppose I as an user had a problem
on build 767 which prevented
On Jul 12, 2010, at 11:03 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
Is there a way to tweak the os300 build so that it brings up the
Libertas device just as eth0 (and doesn't enable the 802.11s features
in the firmware)?
was there a
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:22 AM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
As far as I know, there is NO way to completely disable mesh
support on XO-1 without holding the WLAN card in reset.
Boo. Ok.
Even if you don't support it at the OS level, the firmware will
still behave badly if it
On Jul 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, devel-requ...@lists.laptop.org wrote:
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:22:27 -0400
From: John Watlington w...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: xo-1 os300 -- switch off mesh?
To: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Message-ID:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org wrote:
Um, I think this should send a mesh stop command to the firmware.
echo 0 /sys/class/net/eth1/lbs_mesh
From: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5144
I like hearing from people who know stuff :-)
Excellent, so adding that
I was aware that maybe we had different in scaling/dpi on our
browsers, but Aliosh (from the Perú team) pointed out how large the
difference is between Firefox and Browse.xo:
Here shown between an XO-1.5 on 10.1.1 and an XO-1 on os300, both
showing wiki.laptop.org:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
I was aware that maybe we had different in scaling/dpi on our
browsers, but Aliosh (from the Perú team) pointed out how large the
difference is between Firefox and Browse.xo:
Here shown between an XO-1.5 on
Put about:config in the address bar and check the layout.css.dpi setting
FF may have the default of -1 set. Change it to an actual dpi and see what
happens
- Original message -
I was aware that maybe we had different in scaling/dpi on our
browsers, but Aliosh (from the Perú team)
Why is FF super-sizing my internets?
You should probably include the preferences from:
http://dev.laptop.org/git/activities/firefox-activity/tree/vendor.js
Thank you. I had previously not been paying attention to that file.
[I'm currently using FireFox version 4.0b2pre on my XOs. I've
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:56 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
You should probably include the preferences from:
http://dev.laptop.org/git/activities/firefox-activity/tree/vendor.js
Thanks -- has the DPI and several other things that are worthwhile.
We *have* a bug tracking this,
On 13 July 2010 06:17, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12 July 2010 19:27, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I'm still unconvinced that this is worth changing, given the additional
work that it will cause.
I'd like to hear from the heavy users of trac, in particular Chris (cjb),
15 matches
Mail list logo
