Re: 870 on XO1

2011-06-26 Thread Daniel Drake
On 26 June 2011 00:03, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
 Folks, on XO 1 with new 870 build :

 1) At boot, once the animation has completed its little circle, the screen
 goes black for about 17 seconds before the favourite wheel comes up. Does
 this on multiple XO's.  Does not happen on os23.

Thanks, filed as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11019

 2) In general, boot takes about twice as long on 870 than on os23, again on
 multiple XO's compared.

 3) Activities take longer to launch, flashing icon stays almost twice as
 long on the screen before the screen comes up than it did on os23 for some.

These are due to the filesystem switch, or more specifically the
switch in compression methods used. The result is significantly
reduced disk utilisation (higher compression) but more CPU-intensive
work needed to read and write files. Unfortunate, but true. A slowdown
is expected, as a tradeoff for not shipping a nearly-full disk.

What we've effectively done is reverted to what we had for 10.1.3. So,
a more interesting comparison would be observing build 860 at the side
of build 870. Bear in mind that some activities take a lot longer to
launch the first time after flashing, e.g. Browse and Record, so care
is needed to ensure the comparison is fair.

Thanks,
Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: 870 on XO1

2011-06-26 Thread Kevin Gordon
dsd:

Yes sir, 860 behaves just like 870 in identical comparisons in terms of time
of booting and activity launching, just as you predicted.

However 860 leaves the completed boot animation circle up, instead of
turning the screen black for that rather long period of time between
animation completion and the appearance of the favourite wheel.

Guess I had just gotten used to (and happy with) the quicker osxx series of
builds.

Cheers,

KG



On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:

 On 26 June 2011 00:03, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
  Folks, on XO 1 with new 870 build :
 
  1) At boot, once the animation has completed its little circle, the
 screen
  goes black for about 17 seconds before the favourite wheel comes up. Does
  this on multiple XO's.  Does not happen on os23.

 Thanks, filed as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11019

  2) In general, boot takes about twice as long on 870 than on os23, again
 on
  multiple XO's compared.
 
  3) Activities take longer to launch, flashing icon stays almost twice as
  long on the screen before the screen comes up than it did on os23 for
 some.

 These are due to the filesystem switch, or more specifically the
 switch in compression methods used. The result is significantly
 reduced disk utilisation (higher compression) but more CPU-intensive
 work needed to read and write files. Unfortunate, but true. A slowdown
 is expected, as a tradeoff for not shipping a nearly-full disk.

 What we've effectively done is reverted to what we had for 10.1.3. So,
 a more interesting comparison would be observing build 860 at the side
 of build 870. Bear in mind that some activities take a lot longer to
 launch the first time after flashing, e.g. Browse and Record, so care
 is needed to ensure the comparison is fair.

 Thanks,
 Daniel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Screen dimming XO1 vs XO 1.5

2011-06-26 Thread Kevin Gordon
Folks:

On the XO 1 with the osxx builds and 870, with no power setting options
turned on, the screen still dims after a period of inactivity. The unit is
active, but just the screen has dimmed off.  Tapping a key or the trackpad
brings the screen back on, and everything else including wifi is still
active.  This is a really neat 'feature', as it mitigates some issues with
sleep/resume functions on the XO, while still saving an appreciable amount
of battery life.

However, on the XO 1.5, when, as well,  both items in power settings are
unchecked, the screen never dims.  As such, walking away from the machine
for 20 minutes or so is a pretty significant battery usage hit.  Any chance
at getting the 1.5 to behave like the 1.0? Even if this by design because
the power settings behave better on the 1.5, IMO auto dim of the screen
regardless of settings would be nice.

KG
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: 870 on XO1

2011-06-26 Thread Daniel Drake
On 26 June 2011 14:47, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes sir, 860 behaves just like 870 in identical comparisons in terms of time
 of booting and activity launching, just as you predicted.

 However 860 leaves the completed boot animation circle up, instead of
 turning the screen black for that rather long period of time between
 animation completion and the appearance of the favourite wheel.

Will be fixed in 871, thanks for spotting it.

 Guess I had just gotten used to (and happy with) the quicker osxx series of
 builds.

It's definitely something we'll revisit. When you have a small disk
like ours, it is a hard tradeoff.

Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Screen dimming XO1 vs XO 1.5

2011-06-26 Thread Daniel Drake
On 26 June 2011 14:55, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
 Folks:

 On the XO 1 with the osxx builds and 870, with no power setting options
 turned on, the screen still dims after a period of inactivity. The unit is
 active, but just the screen has dimmed off.

You might be talking about http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10856 but I
don't quite understand your description. Are you talking about a
screen dim where the screen remains on and readable but with less
backlight intensity, or where the screen turns off and goes completely
black?

Thanks,
Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Updates for OLPC English Keyboard mappings table

2011-06-26 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
I have been consulting http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_English_Keyboard
and performing some of my own tests with an external US-style keyboard
(Logitech Internet 350) on an XO-1.5 running XO-AU OS 10.1.3-au2.

So far I have determined that:

  * F1-F4 changes views (Neighbourhood/Friends/Home/Activity)
  * F5 switches to the journal
  * F6 shows the frame
  * F11/F12 controls volume (also, volume controls on most keyboards work)
  * right Alt behaves as AltGr
  * Windows key acts as Hand/Grab (hold this button and move on the
track pad to scroll)
  * my additional volume keys also work

It looks to me that the function/modifier keys for frame, volume and
grab are not mapped in the table on that wiki page. I didn't want to
edit it unless I was sure about it. Can someone knowledgeable please
confirm and/or update the page?

Thanks,
Sridhar



Sridhar Dhanapalan
Technical Manager
One Laptop per Child Australia
M: +61 425 239 701
E: srid...@laptop.org.au
A: G.P.O. Box 731
     Sydney, NSW 2001
W: www.laptop.org.au
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Screen dimming XO1 vs XO 1.5

2011-06-26 Thread Kevin Gordon
Sorry, soon I will learn to use terminology correctly.  In this case, by dim
I meant instant off.  :-)

If I just walk away from an XO1 leaving it up, let's say, on the favourites
wheel, after about 15 mins the screen backlight goes off, not dark, not dim,
it goes completely off. This is with no power saving settings checked on.  I
dont think it's officially sleeping, or idle, since the 'activity' lights
are still flashing, and the unit appears to still be on the WIFI lan.
Tapping on a key brings the screen back on, and it would appear nothing else
is 'resuming', because the rest of the box responds instantly, and to me
still seems to have continued as active.  As, I said, this to me is a
'desired' behaviour.  This is on os23 and 870 on the XO1.

With no power saving setting checked on the XO 1.5 walking away for, o,
let's say, 24 hours,  upon return, the screen is still on at full
brightness.

I'm also now testing simultaneously with 860 on an XO-1  to see if this
screen-off is something 'new'.  20 minutes have already passed with no
'screen off' occurring, but stay tuned.  I'm going to leave it on, and go
out and cut the grass.  I'll then also simultaneously  try the same 4
scenarios in gnome upon return as well.  (XO 1.0/860, XO 1.0/870, XO
1.0/os23, XO1.5/870)

Cheers,


KG



On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:

 On 26 June 2011 14:55, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
  Folks:
 
  On the XO 1 with the osxx builds and 870, with no power setting options
  turned on, the screen still dims after a period of inactivity. The unit
 is
  active, but just the screen has dimmed off.

 You might be talking about http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10856 but I
 don't quite understand your description. Are you talking about a
 screen dim where the screen remains on and readable but with less
 backlight intensity, or where the screen turns off and goes completely
 black?

 Thanks,
 Daniel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Screen dimming XO1 vs XO 1.5

2011-06-26 Thread Daniel Drake
On 26 June 2011 15:22, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
 Sorry, soon I will learn to use terminology correctly.  In this case, by dim
 I meant instant off.  :-)

Yep, this is a known issue - but one that we treat only with low priority.

Auto screen poweroff on inactivity has been implemented on XO-1 but
not on XO-1.5.
The XO-1 implementation is a bit questionable, that's why it is not a
trivial task to include it for XO-1.5.

In future this may get easier, when we get our OLPC-specific display
controller driver into the kernel, and when we eventually move our
graphics driver into the kernel (KMS).

So, I wouldn't worry about digging into this. Here is a relevant
ticket you could track: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9710

Thanks,
Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Screen dimming XO1 vs XO 1.5

2011-06-26 Thread Paul Fox
daniel wrote:
  On 26 June 2011 15:22, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
   Sorry, soon I will learn to use terminology correctly.  In this case, by 
   dim
   I meant instant off.  :-)
  
  Yep, this is a known issue - but one that we treat only with low priority.
  
  Auto screen poweroff on inactivity has been implemented on XO-1 but
  not on XO-1.5.

given you referred to #9710, i'm assuming you think kevin is seeing
DPMS.  did we reenable DPMS on XO-1?  i hadn't realized that.  i've
recommended keeping it off for some time, because it fights with powerd,
but maybe you've fixed that.

  The XO-1 implementation is a bit questionable, that's why it is not a
  trivial task to include it for XO-1.5.

equivalent functionality would be trivial, with a new checkbox to
reconfigure powerd to allow dimming/blanking the screen but prevent sleeping.
this would work on both platforms.

paul

  
  In future this may get easier, when we get our OLPC-specific display
  controller driver into the kernel, and when we eventually move our
  graphics driver into the kernel (KMS).
  
  So, I wouldn't worry about digging into this. Here is a relevant
  ticket you could track: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9710
  
  Thanks,
  Daniel
  ___
  Devel mailing list
  Devel@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel