Re: identifying a 1.75
martin wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote: thoughts/comments? better approaches? obvious additions? Hi Paul timely - I was just hacking on olpc-utils, bitfrost and sugar on exactly the same thing (while on the plane, no internet). Something along the lines of what you have is needed, I'll probably merge it into my hacking. And we need it as part of a mini bash function library as well, machine identification and other tasks reading from ofw are spread across olpc-utils at random. So I'll prolly hack olpc-hwinfo into a shell of what you posted (oh! the pun!) -- calling into shared function calls. And will refactor other scripts to match. something else i found this morning, while looking at #11126 -- udev uses dmi/id/product_name to decide to apply our keyboard map. this won't work on 1.75, so i guess we'll need to choose a/the canonical method of distinguishing a 1.75 from sysfs. paul cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [MeeGo-dev] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Steve McIntyre steve.mcint...@linaro.orgwrote: The initial proposed agenda is: * ARM hard-float + What is it and why does it matter? + How can distributions keep compatible (i.e. gcc triplet to describe the port)? * Adding support for ARM as an architecture to the Linux Standard Base (LSB) + Does it matter? + What's needed? * FHS - multi-arch coming soon, how do we proceed? * 3D support on ARM platforms + Open GL vs. GLES - which is appropriate? but I'm sure that other people will think of more issues they'd like to discuss. :-) from the point of LSB and FHS (as I'm part of both of those workgroups), I don't know if there will be anyone there representing those groups, but if that would be valuable it might be possible to prod LF into sending Jeff Licquia - just ask early enough! Otherwise... Steve, you know where to poke at us. My email address might hint that I might not have any time to work on it, but I'll always answer questions :) ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
trac, authentication, cookie expiry, increase
Someone asked for the trac authentication cookie to last longer than a browser session. This has been applied in trac upstream, so I grabbed the change an applied it to our trac. The cookie now expires in six days. I'm interested to know if it works for you. If you already have a cookie with expiry set to session, then please delete it before reporting a problem. ;-} -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
